Showing posts with label Health Insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Insurance. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

46 and counting: celebrate and protect Medicare

Healthcare-NOW! reminds us that Saturday is the 46th anniversary of Medicare, an opportunity to tell the country how improved Medicare-for-all, and not cuts to health care and the safety net, is the fix for the nation's health care and fiscal crises.

Single payer supporters have organized more than 40 events in 20 states, and Healthcare-NOW! has resources available if you want to organize your own event, including an organizer's toolkit and sample flier. Contact katie@healthcare-now.org for more info.

Read more...

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

AfD National Council member on war, health care, and the central issue of corporate personhood

AfD national council member Rick Staggenborg, MD, who is also founder of Soldiers for Peace International, speaks to Dan Shea, of Veterans for Peace chapter 72 in Portland, OR, about corporate personhood and the sorry state of democracy, especially as it affects veterans.

Rick has formed a new national work group for Veterans for Peace on the abolition of corporate personhood and will ask to introduce a resolution at this year's VFP national convention in Portland, OR calling for an amendment to restore constitutional rights to people. Chapter 72 has scheduled discussion of the issue and the work group at their next meeting.

Read more...

Friday, May 27, 2011

Video: Gov. Shumlin signs Vermont single payer bill

Here's remarks by Governor Peter Shumlin, who this morning signed a bill to bring single payer health care to a state where where 40,000 have no coverage and one in four are underinsured. Shumlin thanked everyone who contributed to the passage of the bill, and singled out the state legislature, whose work on the on this bill was "a tribute to democracy in Vermont."

Read more...

Monday, March 28, 2011

Vermont House passes single-payer health care bill

Vermont becomes the first in the nation to take a major step toward institution of a single-payer health care plan with "Green Mountain Care." Establishing single payer was a big part of Governor Peter Shumlin's election campaign.

by Dave Gram, Associated Press. Posted on The Boston Globe March 24

Every Vermonter could sign up for state-financed health insurance under a bill passed by the House on Thursday that would put the state on a path to a single-payer health care system by the middle of this decade.

"This bill takes our state one step closer to a system that ensures that all Vermonters have access to the care they deserve and contains costs," House Speaker Shap Smith said shortly after the House passed the bill 92-49.

The measure now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass, but with some possible changes.

Gov. Peter Shumlin, who made single-payer health care a centerpiece of his gubernatorial campaign last year, also praised the legislation. He said it would make Vermont "the first state in the country to make the first substantive step to deliver a health care system where health care will be a right and not a privilege, where health care will follow the individual, not be a requirement of the employer, and where we'll have an affordable system that contains costs."

Costs are an open question. The bill sets up a five-member state board to design a benefit package to be called Green Mountain Care, but doesn't require the governor to propose a way to pay for it until 2013. That drew fire from minority Republicans in the House, who said the hard part of reform -- paying for it -- won't be tackled until after Shumlin campaigns for a second two-year term in 2012. They also said the bill would create too much uncertainty for businesses in the state.

"Creating a health care system based on theory and campaign promises is not good policy," said House Minority Leader Don Turner, R-Milton.

Rep. Thomas Burditt, R-West Rutland, went further, arguing that government should sharply reduce, not increase, its role in the delivery of health care.
Burditt quoted V.I. Lenin, leader of the Russian Revolution and founder of the Soviet Communist Party, as saying "medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism," adding, "I believe those who are promoting 'universal coverage' via government-run and government-controlled medicine know this. What they hope is that the public won't find out the truth. There is nothing compassionate about socialism."

That drew a rebuke from Rep. Paul Poirier, I-Barre, a supporter of the bill. "I take offense at the remarks ... that we're socialists, that we're communists," he said. "I ask all members to respect other people's points of view."

Poirier spoke of profit-driven insurance companies denying coverage to people who should have it had coming, and, before Vermont passed laws to bar the practice, "cherry-picking" young and healthy subscribers who would pay into their coffers without being costly to cover.

Despite the Republicans' complaints, majority Democrats largely held together with their leadership to pass the bill. A similar outcome is expected in the Senate, though that chamber's president pro tem, Sen. John Campbell, said members would do their "due diligence" on the bill and might seek some changes.

The bill outlines a four-year timeline leading to establishment of the statewide, publicly funded system. It begins by setting up the Green Mountain Care Board on July 1 with a budget of $1.2 million to begin planning the new system. It then creates a health insurance marketplace -- or "exchange," of the sort required by last year's federal health care legislation. And it then calls for converting the exchange to the Green Mountain Care system.

The Shumlin administration and supporters of the bill need to address numerous uncertainties as the process goes forward. One concerns the more than 100,000 Vermonters who get health coverage from employers who are self-insured, meaning they assume the financial risks of coverage, and are chartered under federal law.

The House defeated a proposed amendment to allow those employers, among them the state's largest, like IBM, to be exempt from paying taxes to support Green Mountain Care. Rep. Anne Donahue, R-Northfield, said that would leave them in a similar situation to parents who send their children to private schools, but pay taxes to support public ones.

Read more...

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Massachusetts health care reform hasn't stopped medical bankruptcies

According to a recent study published in the American Journal of Medicine, medical-related bankruptcies in Massachusetts haven't fallen, despite that state passing a comprehensive health care reform package, on which the national health care legislation was based.

A selling point for the Obama administration's national reform program was that it would lower the incidence of personal bankruptcy triggered by overwhelming medical bills.

One reason for the lack of decline is the cost of health insurance. The study notes that "the least expensive individual coverage available to a 56-year-old Bostonian carries a premium of $5,616, a deductible of $2,000, and covers only 80 percent of the next $15,000 in costs for covered services.” The cost of health care has been steadily climbing as well. Most medical bankruptcies, now as in the past, affect families who already have insurance, but who are left unable to pay the bills that their insurers won't cover.

You can read more about the study at Healthcare-NOW!s website.

Read more...

Monday, February 28, 2011

HR 676, "Expanded and Improved Medicare for All" reintroduced

If your Rep was a sponsor of HR 676, the "Expanded and Improved Medicare for All" bill, it has been reintroduced by Rep. John Conyers. Twenty-eight members of Congress have already signed on--has your's? According to Healthcare-NOW, the bill had 85 cosponsors in the 111th Congress, and has the support of over 17,000 doctors, nurses, organized labor, and many activists across the country.

With new and incumbent reps distancing themselves from last year's health care reform package, is there a chance for headway on this bill? Conyers, in a statement, was optimistic: "To his credit, President Obama stated in his 2011 State of the Union Address that he is open to making changes to the law, so that it can be improved and strengthened. This presents a unique opportunity for supporters of improved Medicare For All to come together and work in a constructive way towards transitioning our for-profit and costly health care system to a high-quality, simple, and cost-effective improved Medicare For All program."

Conyers cited Americans' frustration with the cost of health care and health insurance, and their mistrust of private, for-profit insurers, and noted that that single payer is being seriously considered in some states, most notably Vermont and California.

You can download a .pdf of the bill here. You can download a summary from this page on the Healthcare-Now site.

Read more...

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Scalia, Thomas, recusals and the best judiciary money can buy

It's hard not to be cynical about the alleged conflicts of interest surrounding Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, based on their relationships with conservative groups and, in Thomas's case, his wife's lobbying activities. What do you expect? Corporations buy politicians; "bought" politicians appoint and approve federal judges. If the corporate elite has "the best government their money can buy," the judiciary is certainly well represented in the toybox.

Nevertheless, it's good to see that this story is sticking, and even moving into the mainstream media and influencing some legislative action. Some members of Congress, for instance, are asking Thomas to recuse himself from any SCOTUS consideration of health care reform, based on his wife's lobbying activities ($700,000 of which went unreported on disclosure forms). You can read a letter to Thomas from Reps. Anthony Weiner, Pete Stark, Frank Pallone Jr. and Christopher Murphy here; some seventy other representatives have also supported the effort.

Meanwhile two groups in particular have questioned Thomas's ties to Citizens United and to an ultraconservative retreat hosted by the Koch brothers.

ProtectOurElections.org filed a bar complaint today alleging Thomas's bias and actual conflict of interest for his failure to disqualify himself from the Citizens United case after Citizens United Foundation supported his nomination and spent at least $100,000 on commercials attacking some senators opposed to it. This is the second bar complaint the group has filed. Video here.

Meanwhile Common Cause has asked for clarification on Thomas's 2008 speaking engagement at a conservative retreat organized by the Koch brothers, and has petitioned the Justice Department to investigate. The New York Times reports that Justice Thomas "reimbursed him an undisclosed amount for four days of 'transportation, meals and accommodations' over the weekend of the retreat," although he earlier described it as a "brief drop-by." Rachel Maddow has also picked up the story, talking to Common Cause president Bob Edgar.

Read more...

Monday, November 29, 2010

Portland (OR) presents "Alliance for Democracy--Populist Dialogues"

The Portland Chapter will be screening the first two editions of its new cable TV program, "Alliance for Democracy--Populist Dialogues," in early December. The schedule's at the end of this post.

The half-hour program features David Delk, AfD co-chair and Portland chapter president, as host, with chapter members as crew and tech support.

The first program is on single payer healthcare with one of the Mad As Hell Doctors (Samuel Metz). On the second, Barbara Dudley (former head of Greenpeace USA and National Lawyers Guild and currently co-chair of the Oregon Working Families Party) talks about fusion voting, State Bank of Oregon and Korea Free Trade Agreement.

The program will be on a regular schedule on Portland community access cable starting in January, and will also screen in suburban communities.

If you're not in Portland, you can request a copy of the show to view locally or to screen at your local community access station. The programs will have some content specific to Portland or Oregon but will be general enough to be of interest around the nation.

You can also watch online on the Portland chapter website's Populist Dialogues video page, or on blip.tv. The single payer program with Samuel Metz is here and David talks to Barbara Dudley here.

We are all very excited about this project, so I hope everyone likes them. Your comments are welcome!

Schedule for Barbara Dudley show:

  • Thursday 12/2/2010, 8:00 PM, Channel 22
  • Monday 12/6/2010, 10:30 PM, Channel 11
  • Tuesday 12/7/2010, 7:30 PM, Channel 22
  • Wednesday 12/8/2010, 10:00 PM, Channel 23
  • Thursday 12/9/2010, 8:00 PM, Channel 23

Schedule for Samuel Metz Single Payer program
  • Wednesday 12/1/2010, 7:30 PM, Channel 22
  • Friday 12/3/2010, 4:30 PM, Channel 22
  • Monday 12/6/2010, 10:00 PM, Channel 11
  • Wednesday 12/8/2010, 9:00 PM, Channel 23
  • Monday 12/13/2010, 5:00 PM, Channel 23

Read more...

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Nonbinding referendum on single payer passes in several Massachusetts towns

Thirteen out of fourteen Massachusetts state House districts have voted to approve a referendum calling for a single-payer health insurance plan. The ballot measure was organized by Mass-Care, a statewide coalition of groups in favor of a single payer, Medicare for all system. The last district hasn't totaled up its votes, as of this morning.

The ballot passed in four representative districts that voted for Republican Scott Brown in last year's special Senate election, which was seen as an early referendum on the new federal health care bill.

Massachusetts has its own single-payer bill in the works and the vote on this non-binding referendum will probably result in more state representatives signing on as co-sponsors, according to Mass-Care director Ben Day.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

California: Alerts on Water and Health Care

Thanks to all the Californians who took action on Monday's alert and called Assembly speaker John Perez’s office to urge him to bring SB 801, the California Universal Healthcare Act, to the floor for a vote. Sadly, the bill never made it to the Assembly, and is dead for the year. The bill's sponsor is California state senator Mark Leno--Leno's office couldn't say if the bill would be reintroduced.

Today, though, we're asking people to please contact Governor Schwartzenegger and tell him to sign AB 301, a bill which would require bottled water companies to make public how much water they’re removing from the state’s aquifers. This bill passed last year, and was vetoed. Will the Governator, who’s term of office is up in November, side with the people of California and not the bottled water industry? Maybe, but only if the people call! Email through the official site here, or pick up the phone at 916-445-2841 (fax a letter to 916-558-3160). Thank you.

You can follow action by the Alliance and its many water allies in California at DefendingWaterinCalifornia.org.

Read more...

Monday, August 2, 2010

NYC Assistant DA reopens dismissed cases of health care activists, threatens re-arrest

From Healthcare-Now!

Two activists, who were arrested last fall in a peaceful demonstration and subsequently had charges dismissed by a New York judge, are being told their cases will be reopened, and they should turn themselves in to authorities, or risk arrest.

Healthcare Now is asking people to call Manhattan DA Cy Vance to demand that the case against Kate Barnhart and Joan Pleune stay closed, and the judge's decision to dismiss charges against them be allowed to stand. The contact in Vance's office is Erin Duggan, communications director, at (212) 335-9400. When you call, say:

"I'm calling because I'm concerned about ADA Eric Kratzville's decision to re-file charges against healthcare activists Kate Barnhart and Joan Pleune. These activists were already charged, and their cases were dismissed by a judge. The ADA is wasting city resources by pursuing charges against this nonviolent protest. Instead, he should prosecute real criminals, like insurance companies that deny people lifesaving medical treatment. ADA Eric Kratzville should NOT re-file charges against Kate and Joan."

Last fall, Healthcare-NOW! co-founded the Mobilization for Health Care for All campaign. The campaign organized peaceful sit-ins at insurance companies to highlight their deadly practice of putting profits over people, and to demand Medicare for All. More than 200 activists were arrested in more than 20 cities.

In New York City, 17 activists were arrested at Aetna's offices, in the first of four related protests there, resulting in 49 arrests.

The activists were arrested for "criminal trespass" and "obstructing governmental administration" then spent the night in jail. After repeated court dates over six months, all the activists except Kate Barnhart were eventually offered conditional dismissals. Everyone accepted this offer except for Joan Pleune, who opted to stay in the case in solidarity with Kate. Kate alone was asked to plead guilty to a criminal charge and was offered jail time.

The District Attorney's office targeted Kate because of a previous misdemeanor conviction for an anti-war action--despite several other activists also having prior convictions. However, after the activists' attorney Stephen Edwards filed a motion to dismiss Kate's charges on the basis of "facial insufficiency," Judge ShawnDya L. Simpson granted his motion and dismissed all charges on July 19th.

Unbelievably, on July 30th (incidentally Medicare's birthday!), Assistant District Attorney Eric Kratzville informed the activists' attorney that he is planning to re-file "amended charges" against Kate and Joan and that the two of them should either arrange a date to turn themselves in or be re-arrested against their will.

Read more...

Monday, June 21, 2010

Health Care for California: Call today to support SB 810, the California Health Security Act, and come to Sacramento on June 29 for the hearing!

Thanks to tireless advocacy by people from across the state, SB 810, the California Health Security Act, will have a hearing on June 29 at 1:30 p.m. in the Assembly Health Committee Room 4202, at the Capitol.

Passage of the bill by Assembly Health is a first step through committees, to the Assembly Floor, and then to the Governor. Let's keep up the fight for health care legislation that will provide universal coverage, broaden benefits, and control costs. SB 810 eliminates health insurance companies in California and sets up a state-run California Healthcare System funded by the money currently going into the private system from federal and state budgets, employers, and tax-payers. SB 810 targets spending to where it's needed: doctors, clinics and other providers, and not to excess overhead and administrative costs. Need to learn more? Click here. And support SB 810 with one or both of these actions:

Call your Assembly member and say you want a Yes vote on SB 810. Voter pressure got the bill this far--let's keep it up until it's law! Please call, fax, write, or email your assembly member, especially if you can't attend the hearing. Get their contact information at www.leginfo.ca.gov.

Attend the hearing. A big turnout is crucial to show the Assembly Health Committee and state government that SB 810 has the people's support. Buses and carpools are leaving from San Francisco, East Bay, Central Valley and Placer County--click here to connect with organizers.

Remember, one in five Californians have no health insurance at all. Fewer employers are providing coverage. Insurance premiums are rising four times as fast as wages. And even with the passage of the national health care bill, millions of Americans will still be uninsured, underinsured, or paying far too much of their incomes for coverage. SB 810 gives California an opportunity to show the country what real health insurance reform looks like. Call to support the bill, and join with others in Sacramento on June 29. Thank you!

Read more...

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Declaration of Health Independence and Security

Healthcare advocates from fourteen states met in Wayne, Penn., April 10, 2010. The following Declaration is a result of the meeting. Add your name to the Declaration at Healthcare-Now!'s website.

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for the people of this nation and its separate but equal states to transform conditions related to the common good within our control and necessary in order to assure the basic human rights of all, recognition of our common humanity and a decent respect to the opinions of humankind compel us to declare those conditions for which we demand such a transformation.

Healthcare is a basic human right. To this end, we the undersigned representatives of these assembled states, declare our dedication to the transformation of the profit-driven healthcare system into one of our shared humanity under a social insurance model–a publicly funded, privately and publicly delivered system, equally available to all. Current expenditures on healthcare can and must fund this systemic transformation.

Working in our individual and several states, we will educate our fellow residents, petition our legislators for our collective redress of grievances under the current system, and pursue passage of patient-driven healthcare policy legislation.

We hold these truths still to be self-evident, that all people are created equal and have certain inalienable rights. Among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that in order to enjoy these rights, access to healthcare without regard to financial or any other barriers must be secured.

Signed this 10th day of April, 2010, at Central Baptist Church in Wayne, Pennsylvania.

States represented: West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, California, New York, Colorado, Wisconsin, and Minnesota

Read more...

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

PBS ombudsman backs single payer advocates

ProsperityAgenda.us reports action gets results with PBS--the ombudsman says Frontline has been at fault in not including single payer in their coverage of health care reform. Hat tip to Floridians for Health Care.

Thanks to all of you who responded to our call to action when Frontline reported on the new health law and how it became law and excluded single payer. The ombudsman wrote:

. . . our office was deluged with almost a thousand critical e-mails from people who said they were upset and angry that an hour-long look back at how the White House ultimately hammered out a historic agreement on health care, aptly titled 'Obama's Deal,' failed to deal with the single-payer system advocated by many of those who were not part of the deal. Many of these e-mails appeared to have been generated in response to a handful of websites that criticized the program for what they saw as failures to deal fairly or adequately with this single-payer option and with one of its major proponents, Dr. Margaret Flowers.

The ombudsman went on to note that their was deep and broad public support for single payer among American voters, indeed, it is the most popular reform among Americans:
A public opinion poll by CBS News and the New York Times in February 2009 reported 59 percent of respondents said the government should provide health insurance, and a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine concluded that the same percentage of doctors "supported legislation to establish national health insurance." A bill introduced years earlier in a House committee by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) supporting the single-payer plan through an expansion of Medicare had 87 co-sponsors as of February 2010 (more than any other universal health-care bill) and lots of labor union support.

Then, he concludes his discussion of single payer admitting it was an error for Frontline to exclude it and highlighting, as we did in our letter, that this was the second time Frontline examined health care this year and the second time they excluded single payer.
So, while the hard-nosed journalistic decision may be to focus on the real options and debate, it seems to me that to ignore something that was out there and popular with millions of people and thousands of health-care professionals but not really on the table, was a mistake. Although obviously tight on time, the producers should have found 30 seconds to take this into account because many Americans support it yet the deal makers never mention it nor is the politics of discarding it addressed.

What is also puzzling to me is that this is the second time that producers of major Frontline programs on health care have decided not even to mention the single-payer system with respect to would-be reform. The other program was a March 31, 2009, broadcast of 'Sick Around America' which provoked a substantial amount of controversy and that I also wrote about at the time.

Obviously, the producers, directors and PBS itself heard us and now know that they will be publicly criticized when their reporting excludes the most popular health care reform in America -- the only one that can control costs, provides health care to all, increases consumer choice and ensures health care security for all in America -- single payer health care. You can read the full article by clicking here.

Thanks again for taking action. It made a difference!

Read more...

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

If you watched Frontline's "Obama's Deal"...

... you may have noticed some missing context for Dr. Margaret Flowers's interview. As Healthcare-NOW has it:

"Obama's Deal"...exposed some of the sordid deals struck by congressional lawmakers and the White House with the health insurance industry and Big Pharma...While Frontline extensively interviewed Dr. Margaret Flowers of PNHP, they neglected to broadcast the very reason that she and others risked arrest: to get a single-payer advocate to testify in the Senate Finance Committee hearings on health care. Frontline, rather, depicted these advocates as President Obama's "liberal base" leaving out any discussion about why nurses, doctors, and every-day Americans would risk being arrested by Federal police.

Healthcare-NOW urges you to write to the PBS ombudsman to protest this exclusion of the single-payer viewpoint. "It is wrong for Congress and the media to exclude the most evidence-based solution to our health crisis," according to their press release. "The exclusion of single-payer showed that right from the outset Obama had made a deal with the health insurance, drug, and hospital industries."

Kevin Zeese, Executive Director of Prosperity Agenda, has a response here.

If you missed the broadcast, you can watch "Obama's Deal" online here.

Read more...

Thursday, April 15, 2010

POLL: 59% of those in favor of repeal want Congress to pursue the public option

The fight for a public option, not to mention "Medicare for all" single payer, isn't dead--in fact, the popularity of the public option is one reason why there's so much discontent with the as-passed health care bill, according to this post at ThinkProgress.

They note that a national survey conducted earlier this month by Indiana University’s Center for Health Policy and Professionalism Research (CHPPR) found that while 58% of Americans want the health care reform package scrapped, a majority of those people also favor more liberal legislation that includes a public option. Not only that, but 67 percent of Republicans and 59 percent of Independents also agreed that the public option was an important topic to be addressed by Congress.

ThinkProgress isn't surprised, pointing out that "the public option remained the most popular element of health care reform throughout the 17 month debate. In fact, public opinion turned against the bill as it moved through the legislative process and became more conservative and both Republicans and Democrats continued to tell pollsters that they would like a choice between private and public coverage."

Read more...

Monday, April 12, 2010

Frontline on the dealmaking behind the health care bill

Healthcare-NOW alerts us to an upcoming episode of the PBS documentary series Frontline on "Obama's Deal"--a look at the high-stakes backroom and boardroom negotiating that went on between the health care industry and their friends in Congress and the White House as lobbyists and legislators put the health care bill together. A preview is below:



We hope that the show ask why the health care needs of the American people had to take second place to the profits of insurers, pharmaceutical companies, and for-profit service providers, and why the sensible alternative--single payer health care--was excluded from the debate from the beginning. Frontline's track record on the debate is mixed--a year ago they aired "Sick Around America," which earned brickbats from activists and media reviewers alike for its kid-glove treatment of industry spokespeople.

The show airs on television and cable starting on Tuesday, April 13. Check Frontline's website for local listings.

Read more...

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Medicare-for-All advocates say health care reform bill doesn't meet the needs of people

A statement by Katie Robbins and Tom Knoche of Healthcare-Now, Donna Smith of the California Nurses Association and National Nurses United, and Mark Dudzic of the Labor Campaign for Single Payer. Read the full release for a list of ten serious flaws with the current law.

On Tuesday, President Obama signed the health reform bill into law.  This bill closely resembles the legislation written by Liz Fowler, former Vice President of Public Policy for Well Point, one of the nation’s largest health insurance companies.

Healthcare-NOW!, a national organization supporting expanded and improved Medicare for all, points out that this bill tweaks the same failing non-system of health care in the United States and further entrenches the for-profit private health insurance, drug, and hospital industries diverting to them the resources needed to achieve high quality, universal, comprehensive health care.  

"It is troubling to watch this bill touted as an equal in political significance and social implications to Social Security or Medicare.  As advocates of an improved and expanded Medicare for all system, we must educate more and more people about the difference between transformative healthcare policy that is yet to be achieved and this bill that will leave so many people without access to the basic human right of healthcare.  We must redouble our efforts,"  states Donna Smith, Healthcare-Now steering committee, National Nurses United/California Nurses Association. 

Healthcare-NOW! is most aggrieved about the following aspects of the bill:

1. About 23 million people will remain uninsured nine years out resulting in an estimated 23,000 unnecessary deaths annually. One-third of these will be undocumented immigrants who will be excluded from purchasing private insurance.

2. Millions of people who are not eligible for public health insurance programs Medicaid and Medicare will be pressured to buy commercial health insurance policies costing up to 9.5 percent of their income but covering an average of only 70 percent of their medical expenses, potentially leaving them vulnerable to financial ruin if they become seriously ill. Many will find such policies too expensive to afford or, if they do buy them, too expensive to use because of the high co-pays and deductibles.

3. Those remaining uninsured will be fined up to 2.5% of their income.

4. Insurance firms will be handed at least $447 billion in taxpayer money to subsidize the purchase of their shoddy products. This money will enhance their financial and political power, and with it their ability to block future reform.

5. The bill will drain about $40 billion from Medicare payments to safety-net hospitals, threatening the care of the tens of millions who will remain uninsured.

6. People with employer-based coverage will be locked into their plan's limited network of providers, face ever-rising costs and erosion of their health benefits. As the cost of insurance grows, they will be taxed on their benefits.

7. Health care costs will continue to skyrocket, as the experience with the Massachusetts plan (after which this bill is patterned) amply demonstrates. The industry lobbying group, American Health Insurance Plans, came just short of announcing the industry's next rate increase in its brief statement in response to the bill: "The access expansions are a significant step forward, but this legislation will exacerbate the health care costs crisis facing many working families and small businesses."

8. The much-vaunted insurance regulations - e.g. ending denials on the basis of pre-existing conditions - are riddled with loopholes, thanks to the central role that insurers played in crafting the legislation. Older people can be charged up to three times more than their younger counterparts, and large companies with a predominantly female workforce can be charged higher gender-based rates at least until 2017.  

9. It allows insurers to expand so-called wellness programs that let insurers  penalize subscribers by hundreds—and even thousands—of dollars for not meeting certain "wellness targets," such as a particular cholesterol number, blood sugar measurement or body-weight target.

10. Women's reproductive rights will be further eroded, due to segregation of insurance funds for abortion from all other medical services.

"We now have insurance reform based on a market model, but that model has failed to work up to now.  This bill puts corporate interests before the American people.  What people need is health care, not health insurance," states Katie Robbins, National Organizer of Healthcare-NOW!

Ray Stever, President of the New Jersey One Plan One Nation Coalition states, "Thousands of men and woman have been laid off and are struggling to buy food or pay the rent or mortgage.  Now they are being forced under a mandate to buy health insurance or be financially penalized."

"This bill does nothing to provide relief to state and local governments that face crippling fiscal crises, caused both by the recession and uncontrolled increases in the cost of health benefits for government employees," comments Tom Knoche of Healthcare-NOW!.  "Expanding Medicare to cover everyone would have saved state and local governments literally hundreds of billions of dollars nationwide."

"The attacks on employment-based health benefits continue under this bill.  In fact, it will incentivize employers to shift more and more of the costs of healthcare onto the backs of workers.  Now is the time for the entire labor movement to unite around the movement to achieve Medicare for All," says Mark Dudzic, National Coordinator, Labor Campaign for Single Payer.


Healthcare-NOW! is committed to continuing to educate and advocate on the solution to our health care crisis: a single-payer system or improved Medicare system covering everyone is the only way to create a universal, high quality system at less cost than we currently pay for health care as a nation.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Health care reform: a Massachusetts perspective

Massachusetts already has universal individual mandates and a system of subsidies for lower-income individuals to buy private health insurance. How do Massachusetts single payer activists feel about passage of health care reform? MassCare, the state's single-payer coalition, weighs in:

Late last night the House passed health reform into law, along with a "reconciliation" bill that the Senate is expected also to pass along party lines this week. What does this mean for the movement to make health care a right in Massachusetts, and how should single payer advocates respond?

Millions of uninsured residents in other states will receive life-altering assistance, and the prescription drug 'donut hole' faced by seniors under Medicare will be closed over time - it's important not to understate what a victory this is for many of our supporters and allies.

However, the law will create winners and losers. It contains no meaningful cost controls; the tax on workplace health benefits used to pay for the law will serve as a powerful driver towards universal underinsurance; and Massachusetts in particular will be a 'net loser' under the law, as many of its benefits are already in place here and we will be paying more under the new taxes than most states.

The bill is projected to cover 32 million uninsured people by 2019... However, by 2016 - if health costs and income continue to rise as they have been - the average cost of a family health insurance plan will consume 34% to 45% of an average family income! We know that this is not conceivable for a household budget or for a business that offers coverage to its workers. This tells us something important: we will HAVE to have another major health reform debate - one that does not ignore costs, and does not just shift them onto patients - way before the bill that just passed has been fully implemented. We also know that there is no country on earth, or any region of any country on earth, that has successfully controlled costs without a single payer system or regulations so stringent that private insurers are forced to behave like a single payer system.

This cost crisis will likely reach a head in Massachusetts, where we have the highest health care costs in the nation, before anywhere else. The debate here on how to control health care costs before our health care system implodes will be a crucial moment for the single payer movement to mobilize and ensure that we get health reform that works.

Read more...

After health care reform passage, some things to keep in mind

First, Jane Hamsher lists the bad news about the health care reform law.

And Physicians for a National Health Plan notes that "there is growing awareness that the bill won't work, and, sooner rather than later, we need single-payer national health insurance. As noted by Harvard economist Dr. William Hsiao, the architect of Taiwan's successful health reform, 'You can have universal coverage and good quality health care while still managing to control costs. But you have to have a single-payer system to do it.'"

PNHP asks their supporters to keep talking to the press, publishing opinion pieces, and invite PNHP speakers to your community. You can read their press release on the reconciliation bill's passage as a start to your own letter to the editor on the ongoing fight for single payer.

Read more...