Showing posts with label Election Reform Holt Bill HR811. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election Reform Holt Bill HR811. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2008

Videos of Ohio Election Protection Conference now available online

New at Freepress.org: videos of the "As Goes Ohio ... Election Protection Conference" held September 26-28 in Columbus, Ohio, can now be viewed online here, including the keynote address by Mark Crispin Miller, author of Loser Take All and Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Elections. Click here for the full agenda for the conference. Here's a video of former Alliance national co-chair Cliff Arnebeck with an update on the the King Lincoln Bronzeville lawsuit.

Read more...

Ukiah Valley chapter organizers host "Corporations and Democracy"

On October 3rd Steve Scalmanini and his wife Annie Esposito of the Ukiah Valley Chapter began hosting the first of the two monthly "Corporations and Democracy" radio programs on KZYX that covers Mendocino County, CA (100 miles north of San Francisco.)

Their first broadcast addressed what has been done in swing states to try to steal the 2008 presidential election, explained live by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman of Columbus, Ohio, who are still involved with exposing the fraud in the 2004 election there.

Steve and Annie's program will be on 1st Fridays from 1-2 pm pacific time. On 3rd Fridays the hosts will continue to be Tom Wodetzki and Toni Rizzo of the Mendocino Coast Chapter, who for 10 years have been hosting both monthly shows with a few other members from the coast chapter. (Their guest on October 17th will be Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine.) Webcasts of the programs can be heard live at www.kzyx.org or locally at 90.7, 91.5, or 88.1 FM depending on where you are in the County.

Steve has been active in the Ukiah Valley Chapter (previously known as the Russian River Chapter) since 2003, helping host many speakers and video showings in the area, being semiretired after a career in the electronics business in Silicon Valley from 1973 to 2001. Annie retired in December after ten years as news director at radio station KZYX.

Read more...

Monday, September 8, 2008

NPR spotlights electronic voting

NPR's "Science Friday" took a look at voting machine security and ballot design with guest Larry Norden, of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University and project director for the Voting Technology Assessment Project. You can listen on-line here. We face a scary situation, and perhaps Mr. Norden might strike you as a little too calm, but the info is good.

With about 35% of us voting on hackable direct recording electronic machines in two months, please visit Election Defense Alliance's site to find out what you can do in the next 60 days to make sure all the votes are counted.

Read more...

Friday, January 25, 2008

New version of Holt Bill needs your input

From David Delk and Nancy Price, coordinators of AfD's Honest and Clean Elections campaign:

On January 17th, Rep. Holt (D-NJ) introduced the Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008 (H.R. 5036). This bill comes too late for Super Tuesday, but can make a difference in the November elections.

This alert is long in order to give background and cover the issues for you thoroughly. Thank you for taking the time to read it. Don't forget to forward this message to your friends, and ask them to call too!

H.R. 5036 addresses only questions surrounding the use of touch-screen voting machines. Many election processes are not addressed; for instance, sufficient number of machines and trained election personnel at each polling place, and practices that discriminate against registered voters.

We urge you to call Congress, speak with the legislative aide who handles election bills, and voice your support for HR5036, but with reservation.

Make clear that further reforms are necessary to make sure that all future elections are fair and honest. The full text of the bill is here.

SITUATION IN NEW HAMPSHIRE:
New Hampshire's Democratic primary election ended with questions about discrepancies between the results of hand-counted ballots and those counted by optical-scanning machines, leading to the call for an official recount because of unreliable machines. New Hampshire has no mandatory audits. Thus, close to 80% of the state’s ballots were effectively counted in secret by closed-source optical scanners whose source code is not open to public inspection.
For New Hampshire recount results go to http://www.sos.nh.gov/recountresults.htm

When ballots are counted in secret, the state fails in its obligation to conduct open, transparent elections. The public cannot be confident of secret elections and is left with the burden of proving that the elections were fair and honest by bringing suit, as has happened in Florida, Ohio, Colorado and elsewhere.

CURRENT SITUATION in Congress:
Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) introduced the Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008 (H.R. 5036) on January 17 - a measure to address some of the problems with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002. A vote on the bill has not yet been scheduled. Now is the time to call your Congress members and voice your approval of this measure, but also that more must be done.

This bill does not replace Rep. Holt's earlier Voter Confidence Act of 2005 or later version of 2007 (H.R. 811) that could still be passed by Congress.

BACKGROUND:
In 2002, Congress rushed through the passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) following the tumultuous Florida presidential election by providing funds to replace the obsolete punch-card and lever voting equipment with new electronic vote recording (Touch Screen Voting or DREs) and vote tally equipment (optical scanners).

This new voting equipment proved defective, being in many instances unable to accurately record and count the vote and being subject to insecurities like hacking. Another major problem was a lack of a permanent paper record showing each individual vote. The 2004 election, especially in Ohio, but also elsewhere, made clear the extent of this problem.

In February 2005, Rep. Holt introduced the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act (H.R. 811) to mandate, among other reforms, a voter-verified paper record for all voting systems and an independent audit mechanism.

CURRENT SITUATION:
The Alliance for Democracy and other election groups, said: “Rep. Holt, this bill does not solve the problem.” A voter-verified paper record does not guarantee an accurate vote count because we still do not know how the votes were counted. We cannot inspect the code used in the actual individual counting and cumulative tallying of votes.

The “Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008”
is necessary ...

This bill specifies that state or other voting entities (county election offices) can move from DRE machines to either paper ballots or paper trail systems, both with mandatory audits of 3% of precincts. Audits must be public and the selection of precincts to be audited must be in a public venue. Money is allocated for the switch from DREs to paper ballot/paper trail and for conducting audits.

Also, precincts using DRE machines must also have available paper ballots for voter marking in case of DRE machine failure. It does not require that voters ALWAYS have the option of using a voter-marked paper ballot. It does say that in case of DRE machine failure and, therefore, the use of paper ballots, that these ballots will be treated as if marked by DREs and will not be considered as provisional only.

…but not sufficient

This bill is a better beginning point for reform than past efforts but is not sufficient to produce citizen confidence that our elections are open and honest. It is through the efforts of many voting integrity groups including the Alliance for Democracy, the Election Defense Alliance, and Progressive Democrats of America that we now have a bill requiring either a paper ballot or a paper trail along with mandatory random audits.

However, the Alliance for Democracy continues to have concerns. American elections should be conducted without the use of DRE machines, whether those DRE machines have a paper trail or not. Yet this act allows their continued use.

The Alliance for Democracy reiterates our earlier position of concern and calls for all members to contact their Congressperson and/or Senator with our position:

1. All votes must be made by the voter on a paper ballot (disabled persons could still use an alternate method if needed). Rep. Holt's new bill only requires a paper trail. Paper trails are basically DREs connected to a printer which produces a paper 'receipt’. The voter is then expected to verify the vote. Most voters will assume the ‘receipt’ is correct and not verify its correctness.

2. The federal government must provide adequate funds to the states to ease the financial burden of switching from the defective DREs to voter-marked paper ballots.

3. Random mandatory hand-counted audits must be required. With voter-marked paper ballots, the vote tallies are via computerized optical scanners which can be subject to the same manipulation as the DREs. These audits are the only way to assure the accuracy of the vote.

4. The number of precincts audited should range between 3% and 10% dependent on the difference between the votes received by the 1st and 2nd place winners. The smaller the difference, the more precincts which should be audited.

5. All hand-counted audits must be open, transparent and immediate, within one or two days of the election.

6. There must be a clear ballot chain of custody. For instance, in the 2004 elections, reports of ballots and other vote counts going home with precinct workers were made and so the vote's integrity was lost.

7. The federal government must provide adequate funds to the states to ease the financial burden of conducting the random mandatory hand-counted audits.

8. A paper ballot must always be available. If only a paper trail is required, all voting precincts must be required to offer a paper ballot to all voters as an equal alternative to a DRE machine. All voters must be advised of this alternative and a notice prominently displayed at the polling place. Rep. Holt's bill only requires that paper ballots be made available in the event of an emergency and what would constitute an emergency is not defined.

9. No election subject to audits shall be certified until after the completion of the audit process.

Read more on the issue:
Rep. Rush Holt to Push for Paper Ballots and Vote Count Audits for 2008, by Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet, Posted December 27, 2007

Please take a moment to call or write your members of Congress and demand that this bill can be amended to better protect the integrity of your vote.

You can reach the Capitol switchboard toll free at 1-800-828-0498, or (202) 224-3121.

Links to Representatives’s official sites, including contact info, can be found here. Contact information for Senators can be found here.

Thanks--please let us know what you hear from your members of Congress, and please forward this message to anyone you know who would be interested!

Read more...

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Support the Davis Amendment to the Holt Bill!

Hi AfDers and friends,
Please read this article on the Holt bill--"Will House Leaders Duck Debate on Electronic Voting Compromise?" by Steven Rosenfeld.

The Holt Bill is a "reform" designed to ensure our votes get counted the way we cast them. Critics of the bill as currently written, including the Alliance for Democracy, have advocated a No vote for several reasons including that the bill encourages the use of DRE voting machines instead of mandating voting on paper ballots.

This article notes that an amendment to the bill has been offered which would be a major step in the right direction. It is because many groups, including AfD, have insisted that the Holt Bill must be amended that we have gotten this far. Let's keep up the pressure.

Please call your Representatives in the House NOW now and ask them to support the Davis Amendment to the Holt bill and to demand that the amendment be voted on.

David e. Delk, Co-chair of Alliance for Democracy - Portland Chapter and Chair of AfD's Clean and Honest Election Campaign
503-232-5495
www.afd-pdx.org

Read more...

Monday, April 16, 2007

e-newsletter, April 16, 2007

The Alliance for Democracy
e-newsletter, April 16, 2007

In this Issue:

  • Convention scheduled for Tucson this November--save the dates!
  • Capital District (NY) chapter works for Clean Elections
  • Another change needed to HR811
  • Action Alerts: Iran, Fast Track, Impeachment

Announcing the 2007 Alliance for Democracy national convention
Save the dates--mark your calendar: November 1-4, Tucson, Arizona

Details in a separate email announcement—events include a get-together, workshops on building and strengthening AfD, leadership training, discussion of campaigns and movement building “in alliance” with other groups.

Watch the website and these email newsletters for updates as we build for this great event!


Capital District (NY) chapter works for Clean Elections
by Ethel Silverberg, Capital District AfD

Closing loopholes is easy compared to reforming the campaign system in New York State. But the Alliance for Democracy has joined with Citizen Action New York to do just that.

The Alliance for Democracy Capital District chapter and Citizen Action are encouraging the New York State Assembly to support full public funding of elections, known as Clean Money Clean Elections reform. AfD members across the state are being contacted and asked to write or call their state legislators on this issue.

While New York passes a partial public financing bill every year, that legislation doesn't go far enough to get big money out of politics. While this year’s partial public funding bill has already been introduced, a bill supporting full public funding will be filed later this month, and this is what we’re asking Assembly members to approve.

The New York State legislature has been called the most dysfunctional legislative body in the country. It’s said that money flows into campaigns like water into a sewer. Fundraisers are held in Albany, the capital, hundreds of miles from some legislators' home districts. Constituents don't attend these parties; they're not invited. The guest list is drawn from the list of lobbyists registered with New York State, who come with bags of money, attending as many as three to five events in one night. "Hello, I'm here, nice to see you, goodbye." Admission to these soirees costs hundreds of dollars, and is only one part of what in Albany is called "dialing for dollars."

As the Alliance is committed to getting money out of politics, here's the chance for reform. If you're from New York, call your state legislator--he or she needs to hear from you. And, if you have friends or family in New York, forward this newsletter to them and urge them to make the call, too.


Another change needed to Holt Bill, HR811

HR811, or the Holt Bill, will receive its final House markup when the House reconvenes on Monday, April 16. Prior to Congress’s Spring Break we stopped H.R. 811 from coming to the floor for a vote. Now we must to the same again: Call and fax your congressional member now.

Now another amendment to the Holt Bill is urgently needed to protect the right of voters to sue if they believe their rights have been violated. Here’s a summary of the argument.

Pending Election Reform in Congress Doesn't Give Citizens Right to Sue

Should citizens explicitly be allowed to sue if they can prove their votes have been stolen or miscounted by electronic voting machines? This right, a cornerstone of the federal Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act, is missing from HR811, the Holt Amendment to the Help America Vote Act. Instead, the bill says citizens can sue under other laws.

Our elections are run at the county level, with administrators seeking to retain considerable autonomy over the process. They don't want to deal with lawsuits. But voting rights campaigners know that without the right to use, otherwise known as "private cause of action", thousands of what Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr has described as "separate and unequal" jurisdictions will be even less free and fair.

Suits filed in Ohio after the 2004 elections using the Voting Rights Act's private cause of action have had dramatic results. But they would not have been helped by the most recent version of HR811.

The right of individuals to seek legal redress is one more safeguard in an increasingly automated election environment. That's why there should be a new and explicit private cause of action in HR811, especially as many people predict the bill that will come out of the House will not ban electronic voting machines, but instead seek to regulate this divisive new technology.

The full story by Steven Rosenfeld is available at www.alternet.org/story/50492.


Allied Actions
Iran: Back the Webb Amendment:
A few days before Good Friday, some US and Russian media reported that US forces are in position to deliver aerial attacks against Iran and its nuclear infrastructure.

Senator Jim Webb of Virginia has introduced an amendment, S.759, to the Iraq supplemental spending bill that would reintroduce language stripped from the bill to bar funds from being used to attach Iran, and require the President to get Congressional authorization before ordering an attack. The bill has no co-sponsors yet.

Please contact your Senator and urge support the Webb amendment. Speak out against the dangers of another preemptive war. Read the talking points by Phyllis Bennis, Transnational Institute and Institute for Policy Studies, on the United for Peace website (http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=3564).

AfD chapters and national sign on to Fair Trade campaign: The Alliance for Democracy national organization, and chapters in Oregon, Maine, California, and Indiana have joined 713 organizations in signing a letter drafted by Public Citizen urging the Democratic leadership in Congress to not bring forward legislation for renewal of Trade Promotion Authority ( “Fast Track”). You may read the letter at http://www.citizen.org/documents/FastTrackSignOnLetter32907.pdf.

Fast Track gives presidents enormous authority over trade agreements and bans Congress from amending them. It spawned NAFTA, CAFTA and the WTO. Fast Track authority expires June 30, and even though the current Congress leans more toward fair trade than before, we need to organize to make sure we overcome the corporate money and influence that wants this measure renewed. The time to weigh in is now.

National groups push impeachment events: (Remember -- public pressure led to the impeachment of Nixon.) More than 25 groups have endorsed a Spring 2007 Impeach Bush and Cheney drive. Highlights include:

  • A corporate shopping boycott. Between now and April 22 (Earth Day) more than 1,000 groups worldwide are asking members to forgo major purchases. Walk pass corporate chain stores and malls, and go to your local markets, restaurants and second hand shops. Visit www.wearenotbuyingit.org for more info
  • The Show it Off! Campaign runs from April 23-27. Wear your pro-impeachment T-shirts, hats, buttons, or what-have-you to build public support for impeachment. Info and some apparel available at http://showitoffnow.blogspot.com
  • On April 28, a coalition of groups are sponsoring a national day of action for impeachment. Info on joining and supporting local actions at http://www.a28.org
  • Join The Million Phone March phone-in to Congress campaign at http://www.millionphonemarch.com/impeach_already.php



Read more...