This is our year for Single Payer!

  • Read Alliance press releases here.
  • Get active: Check out the latest action alerts here.
  • Follow the real story in independent media, here.
  • NEW! Watch video reports and commentary here.
  • Justice Rising's issue on the healthcare crisis is available online here.
  • Download material for tabling, outreach and education here.

What are you doing--locally, at the state level, nationally--to fix our healthcare system? Let us know at afd@thealliancefordemocracy.org!

Monday, July 13, 2009

Draining America Bottle By Bottle: Nestlé builds an empire at the expense of rural communities

by Norah Shipman. Posted on Washington Bureau/Stories that Matter Monday, July 13

Swiss-owned Nestlé is the Walmart of the bottled water industry. Like the mammoth retailer, Nestlé is a volume powerhouse: it already controls a third of the bottled water market in the United States and is expanding.

There is a reason: huge profits. Perhaps you recognize its products: Arrowhead, Calistoga, Deer Park, Perrier, Poland Spring, and Ice Mountain. The bottled water market in the U.S. is the largest in the world, with more than 8.82 billion gallons sold in 2007.

Thirty years ago, the bottled water industry barely existed. Who would pay for something you could get for free? Now, Americans spend more on Poland Spring, Fiji Water, Evian, Aquafina, and Dasani than on iPods or movie tickets, according to Fast Company magazine.

The water for Pepsi’s Aquafina and Coke’s Dasani comes from municipal sources. Nestlé’s source is spring water. At first glance, that might seem like a better option——treated tap water versus natural spring water. Unless, of course, it’s your spring Nestlé is tapping.

Nestlé’s bottled water empire targets small towns across America and buys the right to pump from their local springs. And it turns those towns into the Hotel California: once it checks in, it never checks out. The result: the Swiss conglomerate now controls a third of the American market for bottled water.

In addition to massively lowering water tables around the country, Nestlé has left a trail of suspicion because of its business practices. When a local water official questions the effect Nestlé can have on a water supply, that official may hear from local politicians who argue that jobs now are more important than the environment or water supplies a decade from now.

This is how it works: Nestlé, using its vast resources, approaches small, often rural communities and then takes control of what is often their only natural resource. It promises these communities jobs in exchange for water rights and other necessary permits. But what soon becomes clear to many local citizens is that when the plant is built, promised jobs are often filled by outsiders or temporary workers. Opponents argue that beautiful landscapes are destroyed and the local spring, often very special in a small town, soon becomes a shadow of itself or off limits altogether. Sometimes Nestlé even pumps water from springs that are already in drought-stricken areas. With its vast power and the promise of huge profits per gallon of water extracted Nestlé does whatever it takes to convince politicians and community leaders to turn control of this natural resource over to them.

“Nestlé is riding on the hopes that people in the community will see them as a spur for economic growth,” said Deborah Lapidus, national organizer for Corporate Accountability International. “So Nestlé targets rural, economically depressed communities and makes all kinds of promises about jobs and economic renewal. These are promises that they often don’t fulfill.”

Jane Lazgin is the director of corporate communications for Nestlé Waters North America Inc. She disagrees with Lapidus and said Nestlé typically provides 60 jobs when they first open plants and 250 later on, and that these jobs go to people who live within 30 miles of the plant.

However, Ruth Caplan, campaign coordinator for the Alliance for Democracy’s Defending Water for Life, said, “The fact of the matter is that there are very few jobs that are created and often they bring in people with particular expertise from out of town.”

Jon Keesecker, senior water organizer for Food and Water Watch, which released a report critical of Nestlé’s bottled water industry in 2008 called “All Bottled Up,” said more people are becoming aware of what Nestlé does and how bottled water is not better than tap.

“More and more people are coming to understand that companies like Nestlé withdraw this water for next to nothing and then sell it at huge profits,” he said. “As the people become more educated about what’s happening, there is a growing critique of the bottled water industry in general and bottled water as a product.”

When you think of Nestlé what do you think? Gerber baby food, Cheerios, Lean Cuisine, Jenny Craig, Haagen-Dazs ice cream, Purina pet food?

“You’re coming up against a lot of corporate power,” Caplan said. Her organization helps local communities fight Nestlé’s overtures. “I think given that we’re up against this immense corporation, we’re doing very well.”

Nestlé determines where to build their plants through studies done by a team of ten geologists and consideration of taste and how viable the springs would be for drinking water.

Nestlé spokesperson Lazgin said they also make sure there would be no negative impact on neighbors. It is a near constant process of looking for new plant locations to keep up with market demand. “For the most part, it’s measuring consumer demand and it’s also a policy we have to diversify our spring water forces so that we never rely on only one source and we can draw from several sources at a lower level.”

Lazgin said when Nestlé finds communities in which they want to build plants, they ask for input from residents, answer questions about the plant, and understand their point of view.

“It is our responsibility to openly communicate with communities and, of course, abide by all their regulatory requirements, laws, rules, and imposed procedures that control how we withdraw water and how much we withdraw and how we operate our bottling plant.”

But citizens across the United States who have battled Nestlé say this has not been their experience. Instead, Nestlé has met with local officials without telling residents, not informed them of plans to build their plants, not allowed residents to attend “public” meetings, and withdrawn more water than residents think is necessary and good for the environment.

Look for Part II of this story––Fighting the Corporate Giant: Rural communities stand up to Nestlé, soon.

Read more...

United for Peace with Justice asks for action to prevent escalation of US-Iranian conflict

The violent suppression of election protests by the current Iranian government should not be used as an excuse for cancelling direct talks between the US and Iraq. The official White House position supports these talks, and United for Peace with Justice asks that you call and sign an on-line petition to keep communication on track and to emphasize the protesters' calls for non-interference in Iran's internal affairs.

1] Call the White House at 202-456-1111 and let it know that you want Obama to stick to his promise of direct talks with Iran.

2] Sign-on to Just Foreign Policy's petition to President Obama, which urges him to keep to the principle of non-interference in Iran's internal affairs.

And to show solidarity with the people of Iran and their elementary right to protest their government's actions, UFPJ urges supporters to join up with the non-partisan United For Iran Global Day of Action, for a national rally July 25--check the website to see if there is an action near you. (Blog editor's note: The web address is http://united4iran.com, but we couldn't access the page today.)

Read more...

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Help send farmers-in-training to Tapped

Emily Posner, of AfD's Defending Water in Maine campaign, is also a volunteer consultant with a job training program for Somali immigrant youth who are learning organic farming in southern Maine. She's hoping to bring ten students to the Maine International Film Festival and the premiere of Tapped, and would gratefully appreciate donations to help purchase tickets and possibly offset other travel expenses. For more info, email Emily at poscreek@gmail.com.

Read more...

Portland OR AfD to work on city council resolution on Hanford nuke site

The same corporations which produce nuclear waste also get the contracts for cleaning it up, and the longer it sits around the bigger the problems--and the profits. Portland AfD has gotten their city council interested in addressing problems at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, according to David e. Delk, Portland Alliance for Democracy.

Before each Portland city council meeting the public can make brief statements on matters of concern. Recently, AfD members Nancy Matela and David Delk took advantage of that opportunity to present their concerns on US Department of Energy plans to move new nuclear waste to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state. Hanford is the site of the development of plutonium for the nuclear bombs which leveled Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WWII. The nuclear waste from that as well as from additional nuclear weapons development at the site and elsewhere around the nation in the intervening years remains on site, largely uncleared or contained, with leakage now flowing into the Columbia River, the fourth largest river in the United States.

In spite of the 1989 Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) which set time tables ("milestones" in USDOE speak) for the clean up of Hanford, most of the toxic waste still remains. One TPA provision stated that no new nuclear waste is to be taken to Hanford until the existing waste is cleaned up. The time tables have continually been adjusted into the future (some estimate that clean up of the single shell storage containers will not be complete until 2100; the expected life of the containers was originally stated to be 20 years) and very little clean-up has occurred. Nonetheless, USDOE is going to issue Environment Impact Statements in the near future to move more nuclear waste for "recycling" to Hanford. Recycling will produce more nuclear waste, waste which will be stored on site in clear violation of the TPA.

Nancy and David called on the City of Portland to develop statements or resolutions of opposition to these plans. They were met with favorable responses from Mayor Adams and other council members. Mayor Adams asked that we work specifically with him and his office on this important environmental and health issue.

Note that the same corporations which produce nuclear waste also get the contracts for cleaning it up. And the longer they delay the clean-up, the larger the contract and, therefore, the profits are. Bechtel states on their website "Over the past half century, we've been a global leader in the design and construction of fossil- and nuclear-fueled power plants." On another page of Bechtel's website we learn that "Bechtel National is building a nuclear waste treatment plant for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Hanford." Either way, making nuclear waste or trying to clean it, Bechtel makes a profit.

Please keep posted on further developments and announcements for when public meetings and comment periods will happen by either going to our website (www.afd-pdx.org) or joining our email list (send message to join to davidafd@msn.com).

Read more...

More from Maine: Rockland City Council to vote on pro-single payer resolution on Monday

Update: the meeting starts at 7 p.m., not 6 p.m. as originally posted!


The fight for single payer health care isn't just a congressional battle. Resolutions supporting single payer have been passed by state legislatures and city councils as well, and encouraging your very local government to support a single payer system is a good way to build awareness of this equitable, economical alternative, especially at a level where there is less influence by lobbyists, less "pay to play" politics, and a greater awareness of the struggles that the majority of us face in paying bills and maintaining a level of economic security and dignity--many municipalities face the same struggles!

In Rockland, Maine, Councilwoman Lizzie Dickerson has put a Resolution in Support of Single Payer Healthcare on the agenda of Rockland City Council's upcoming Monday, July 13th meeting. This resolution is similar to the one passed by the Maine State Legislature last April.

Organizers are urging everyone--regardless of whether they're a Rockland resident--to attend the council meeting, which starts at 7 p.m. 6 p.m. on Monday, July 13. Out-of-staters can follow developments at www.midcoasthealthcarereform.org/index.html

Read more...

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Tapped premieres at Maine International Film Festival

Join Maine's Water Justice Community for the world premier of Tapped, a shocking look at the bottle water industry and the communities it impacts, featuring stories from those fighting bottle water around the country and in Maine, including AfD Defending Water for Life campaign coordinator Ruth Caplan.



The film shows a few times during the film festval, but the premiere is Sunday, July 12 at 3:30. Carpool and pack the theater!

To buy tickets online for Tapped, see this page on the Maine International Film Festival site. For general info, the home page for the festival is here. For info on the Defending Water in Maine campaign, see the campaign website or contact organizer Emily Posner.

Read more...

Monday, July 6, 2009

Christian Science Monitor: The Missing Piece of the Health Care Debate

by David R. Francis. Posted at the Christian Science Monitor, July 1

If no one is paying any attention, create a fuss.

Maybe that explains why 13 doctors and nurses got arrested last month when they disrupted a Senate hearing. Their protest: The committee wasn’t considering a single-payer solution to fix America’s healthcare system.

In fact, as healthcare reform works its way through Congress, the idea of a government-paid national health-insurance system hasn’t gotten very far in the Washington debate.

Perhaps it’s too politically radioactive. Or too difficult to pass. For whatever reason, neither the most Democratic Congress in decades nor the most liberal president since Jimmy Carter have opted for a sweeping national health-insurance system, as exists in Europe and Canada, where private insurers disappear and government pays the tab.

“There are countries where a single-payer system works pretty well,” President Obama, a onetime single-payer supporter, told the American Medical Association June 15. “But I believe … that it’s important for our reform efforts to build on our traditions here in the United States.”

That stance leaves single-payer advocates in a political quandary.

“We haven’t yet applied enough pressure to get done what has to be done,” says David Himmelstein, cofounder of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP). Maybe, he added, “we will have to give strong consideration to civil disobedience.”

Why are single-payer advocates so passionate? For one thing, many of them see medical healthcare as a civil right for all Americans.

Call up the Internet home page of Rep. John Conyers (D) of Michigan and immediately, without further clicking, a video shows the congressman talking on the House floor about one of “the biggest challenges of the 21st century” – healthcare reform. His bill would provide national health insurance to every person with no deductibles or copayments for medical treatment. Uncle Sam – via citizens – would pay the bill.

Prospects for his bill in Congress don’t appear strong, although 80 House members have signed on to his bill and 59 percent of physicians back national health insurance, according to a new poll.

Public support has also grown over the years. In 1979, 40 percent of Americans thought the federal government should provide national insurance; last month, 72 percent supported the idea, according to CBS News/New York Times polls.

“Things have gone very well for us,” says Quentin Young, PHNP’s national coordinator. “There has been a new surge of support in the last few months.”

Economic stress may explain some of that shift. In 2007, even before the recession, medical bills were the cause for more than 60 percent of bankruptcies, a new Harvard study finds. More than 75 percent of these bankrupt families had health insurance, but it wasn’t enough, Dr. Young points out.

Reformers of every stripe figure that today’s system is unsustainable in the long run. The Congressional Budget Office projects national healthcare costs to rise from today’s 18 percent of gross domestic product, the total output of goods and services in the nation, to more than 30 percent in 2030 and 50 percent by 2080. That assumes modest cost-cutting measures are imposed. Without them, healthcare costs would consume nearly the entire economy by 2080, an impossibility.

Compromise reforms under consideration in Congress are economically “not feasible,” Dr. Himmelstein says, “The likelihood we can afford what they are offering is nil.”

So he figures a single-payer plan is essential. Just cutting the system’s bureaucratic overhead from today’s 31 percent of total expenditures to Canada’s level (1 percent) would save nearly $400 billion annually, more than enough to cover the 48 million now uninsured, he argues.

So why hasn’t Congress moved toward a single-payer system? The financial and political clout of health industries, charges Himmelstein.

And who was the top recipient of their largess in the 2008 election cycle? Mr. Obama.

Read more...

Washington Post: Old pols lobby for the health care industry--at a cost of $1.4 m a day

A story in today's Washington Post by Dan Eggen and Kimberly Kindy, details the health care industry's use of former Congress members and staffers as lobbyists. The writers' analysis shows that "three of every four major health-care firms have at least one former insider on their lobbying payrolls."

"The hirings are part of a record-breaking influence campaign by the health-care industry," write Eggen and Kindy, "which is spending more than $1.4 million a day on lobbying in the current fight, according to disclosure records. And even in a city where lobbying is a part of life, the scale of the effort has drawn attention. For example, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) doubled its spending to nearly $7 million in the first quarter of 2009, followed by Pfizer, with more than $6 million.

Read more...