Showing posts with label Democratic Home Rule. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democratic Home Rule. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

A forgotten narrative from our (anti) colonial past

Before Lexington and Concord, there was Worcester, where in 1774 militia from 37 surrounding towns seized control of the county court in defiance of the British, who had revoked the Massachusetts charter, and by extension, the authority of individual town meetings, in retribution for the Boston Tea Party. What citizens in Worcester did was quickly copied in other Massachusetts shire towns, except in Boston, where British troops guarded the courthouse.

In this TEDx talk, historian Ray Raphael asks why this early story isn't better known and asks who decides which stories are told. If we, the people, are the stewards of our own history, are we too focused on the narratives that come from established authors (Emerson, Longfellow), featuring individual and heroic leaders (Paul Revere on his midnight ride), blood and thunder (the shot heard round the world), and Davids overcoming Goliaths? What stories have we missed? What kinds of resistance might they inspire?


Read more...

Monday, September 21, 2009

Battle in full swing in Mendocino County, CA: Corporate developer vs. local community

by Steve Scalmanini, Ukiah Valley Chapter

In June I reported on the campaign underway in Mendocino County, California, between one of the nation’s largest real estate investment trusts, Developers Diversified Realty ("DDR"), and the local community over an initiative on the November 3rd ballot. If passed, the measure would rezone a closed industrial plant site that DDR bought a few years ago, just outside the City of Ukiah, from industrial to commercial zoning so it could build the County’s first large shopping mall.

The developer and its local front groups, "Mendocino County Tomorrow" and "Yes on Measure A, Citizens to bring jobs, tax dollars and local shopping to Mendocino County—A coalition being led by Mendocino County Tomorrow with major funding by DDR DB Mendocino LP" (honest – that’s their full name; see if you can say it three times quickly!) have spent $297K through June on campaign activities to reach a total of 49,000 voters in the County. And all of that funding has come from DDR; not a penny has come from any county resident. The community opposition, Save Our Local Economy ("SOLE"), has spent a whole $654 through June, all from small local donations. Both campaigns have spent more since June but we won’t know how much until next month.

Each side is campaigning with a fundamentally different method. The developer is funding telephone calls (from outside the State) to voters. Their first mailer went to voters in August and touted the same allegations they’ve been saying for years – keep sales tax revenue local, create jobs, and shop locally. In recent weeks they’ve been paying some of the local unemployed to go door-to-door to deliver another flier.

On the other hand, volunteers for SOLE have been soliciting the public for endorsements and more volunteers one-on-one at public events and stores over the summer. Their number of volunteers is now in the hundreds and endorsers are several time that. Funding is still slim so they’re busy these days hand assembling their first mailer to reach voters. The developer’s sponsored web sites are www.VoteYesOnMeasureA.com, www.mendocinocountytomorrow.com and www.mendocinocrossings.com. SOLE’s site has changed since the June article to www.NoOnA.com.

The result of the election will determine the future of the retail economy and general character of the rural Ukiah Valley in Mendocino County, two hours drive north of San Francisco. Will the local retail economy, characterized by one quaint downtown and several strip malls scattered throughout the City and just outside its borders, be decimated by a new mega-mall a half mile outside of town? I’ll have the answer in November.

Read more...

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

"Corporations and Democracy" radio show now archived on the web

We're going to be posting audio .mp3 files of the radio show "Corporations and Democracy," hosted by AfD'ers Steve Scalmanini and Annie Esposito on KZYX&Z, Mendocino County public radio. This first installment can be downloaded here. It aired last month and features an interview with John Foster of the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, an educational non-profit focusing on progressive ballot initiative campaigns nationwide. He discusses the center's project on ballot initiative integrity, especially in relation to a petition for a major mall development in Mendocino County. You can learn more about how the ballot initiative process is being mis-used at www.stopballotfraud.org.

Please leave a comment to let us know if transcripts of the show would be useful to you!

Read more...

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Corporation-funded referenda and signature fraud on "Corporations and Democracy"

This Friday on KZYX and Z's "Corporations and Democracy", Annie Esposito and Alliance for Democracy council member Steve Scalmanini will discuss the growing trend of corporation funded initiative campaigns like the one currently underway in Mendocino County (read Steve's article on the campaign here). Was April's signature drive, funded by Developers Diversified Realty of Ohio, fraudulent? Were you misled, or even lied to, to entice you to sign their petition? Are California's voters protected from fraudulent petition circulators? What are some other states doing to prevent fraudulent initiatives? Steve and Annie's guest will be Joel Foster, Deputy Director for Programs at the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, that sponsors the Web site www.stopballotfraud.org. The show airs this Friday, July 3rd, from 1:00 to 2:00 pm Pacific time, on KZYX and Z - 90.7, 91.5, and 88.1 FM, and streams at www.kzyx.org.

Read more...

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Will Mendocino County be an Epicenter of Corporations vs. Local Citizens in 2009?

By Steve Scalmanini, Ukiah, California
One of the battles between corporations and local citizens is heating up in rural Mendocino County, CA, and will almost certainly come to a head on November 3rd of this year. That is when voters will decide whether to approve an initiative on the County-wide ballot to change the zoning of a former industrial plant site to mixed-use so a developer can build the County’s first large retail mall. The battle has been brewing since 2005 when real estate investment trust ("REIT") Developers Diversified Realty, Inc. ("DDR") of Beachwood, Ohio, purchased an industrial plant site that the Masonite Corporation had used for 50 years to make molded siding and doors from sawdust and resins, and which it closed in 2001. The plant is located just a quarter mile outside the City of Ukiah.

DDR's efforts in the ensuing years to have the zoning changed met with resistance from several local interests who want the site to remain zoned industrial for future industry, and who want to direct large chain-store retail development to the south end of the City of Ukiah, adjacent to the few other similar stores like Wal-Mart, Staples, Food 4 Less, and a few regional chain stores.

In last year’s election for the County Board of Supervisors, all three winning candidates were against the proposed zoning change. Likewise for the two candidates reelected to the Ukiah City Council. (Unopposed, actually.) So the developer was headed for defeat in their effort to get their desired zoning changed through normal government processes.

So DDR funded a petition circulation in April to garner enough signatures to qualify an initiative to change the zoning to their desired mixed-use. The campaign was the talk of the County as petition circulators from outside the County badgered the public outside groceries and other businesses more aggressively than anyone had ever seen before to sign the petition. Moreover, the pitches of the circulators were misleading to say the least – downright deceptive to many. The most commonly reported lie to gain signatures was that the petition was "to clean up the Masonite site", which of course appealed to many voters in this environmentally conscious County. But this is not true. The site is required by California State law to be cleaned up before it can be reused for any purpose. Some of the public questioned the circulators about this claim, and pried further into the true intent of the petition, which let to plenty of exchanged words. One of these even led to a fist-fight after which the circulator involved was served with a restraining order.

Within a few weeks their aggressive, deceptive signature gathering had garnered enough signatures to qualify the initiative for an election. On June 9th the County Elections Officer informed the Board of Supervisors that enough signatures were confirmed as valid to qualify the initiative for an election. For what it’s worth, the invalid signature rate was 19%.

Weeks after this invasion of the corporate-funded circulators I found a rational explanation for what they had been up to. The deceptive activities of corporate funded initiatives are explained at www.stopballotfraud.com. You’ll find there a list of the infamous companies that do the bidding of corporations to get initiatives on ballots for the benefit of those corporations. These include Arno consulting, the outfit hired by DDR to do the deed here in Mendocino County.

DDR has already funded their campaign with over $180,000, which is over $2 per voter, and the election is still five months away. If you want to see the latest version of what corporate America is throwing at the public to charm them into supporting sprawl, have a look at www.mendocinocountytomorrow.com and www.mendocinocrossings.com. If you wonder why the former of those two Websites doesn’t even mention the initiative, its "Links" page has no links, its "FAQ" page has no FAQ’s, and members are accepted only as "Recommended By", so do I. Yet their organization sponsored the petition drive. The latter Web site will show you the latest in green-washing a pig-in-a-poke.

The Web site for the "Home Team" defending our local community and economy, known as "Save Our Local Economy" ("SOLE"), is at www.nomegamall.com. Donations are welcome, of course; SOLE is up against big money. Look for an update on the campaigns in next month’s AfD E-Newsletter.

Read more...

Friday, February 20, 2009

Nestlé is moving fast--southern Mainers need your help!

A message from Emily Posner, Maine organizer for the Defending Water for Life Campaign:

Dear Water Warriors and Allies of the cause to keep Maine's water out of corporate hands:

The water justice movement is growing fast in Maine thanks to the tireless efforts of dedicated citizens in places like Shapleigh and Newfield, Maine. Shapleigh and Newfield are small rural communities, nestled in the foothills of the Presidential mountain range. Combined, the towns' population is less then 4,000 residents.

These two small Maine towns share an abundant sand and gravel aquifer that is protected by the 4,000 acre Vernon Walker Game Management Area. Vernon Walker is publicly owned state land that is managed by the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. In 2006, without any public oversight, Nestlé sunk up to 16 bore wells in this public land to determine the viability of industrial water extraction. When the state offered a price/gallon too high for the Fortune 500 company, they started bargaining with Shapleigh town officials in an effort to instead begin operating on town land adjacent to Vernon Walker.

Meanwhile, concerned citizens from around the area have united to oppose Nestlé's intrusion into their rural community. They have formed POWWR -- Protecting Our Water and Wildlife Resources. POWWR is committed to protecting their community's natural resources for today and into the future. Please visit www.defendingwaterinmaine.org/POWWR to learn about POWWR's history and local organizing effort.

On September 20, 2008, Shapleigh citizens sent a clear message to Nestlé when the town voted overwhelmingly for a 180-day moratorium to protect their groundwater. They also voted NO to drilling and testing by Nestlé on the town-owned parcel of land.

In the Boston Globe, Nestlé's lead geologist was quoted as saying, "we might need to force our hand" in regards to the resistance of Shapleigh and Newfield residents. And since the vote in September, the company has not stopped in its efforts to get the precious water from this area, and the Town's elected officials are attempting to push forward an ordinance that will open the door to large scale industrial water extraction.

Meanwhile, POWWR continues to organize and are working on an ordinance that will protect their community's right to self-government and say no to commercial water extraction. Read about it here.

POWWR needs support in their inspiring grassroots effort to protect their community's water resources, ecosystems and town's right to determine its future. We are trying to raise $500 to support this tremendous effort. Please consider making a small tax deductible donation. If just 50 people made a $10 donation, the goal would be reached. You can make a donation on-line here or send a check directly to POWWR, 185 Hooper Road, Shapleigh, ME 04076 (POWWR@live.com).

Read more...

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Massachusetts members begin work to pass citizens' trade commission bill

The Boston Cambridge Alliance and North Bridge Alliance for Democracy will be working this spring to build a coalition of activists and groups to advocate for a bill creating a state commission to study the impact of federal trade pacts on state laws and policies.

The bill was first proposed in 2002 in wake of federal judgments against Massachusetts in cases brought by private corporations who claimed that international trade agreements overruled state laws. Its most recent version brings the structure and representation on the committee closer to that of existing committees in Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire.

Massachusetts supporters are urged to contact Barbara at bclancy122@earthlink.net and find out how to get involved. Info on the bill will be posted at www.newenglandalliance.org.

Read more...

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Is the Trans-Texas Corridor dead?

According to the Associated Press, among others, state officials are scrapping the Trans-Texas Corridor, a transportation component of the Security and Prosperity Partnership.

Since 2002 Texas Governor Rick Perry had promoted the corridor, which was envisioned as a huge set of highways, rail and utility lines crisscrossing the state but had been under fire almost since its inception. Rural landowners in particular were opposed to giving up their property for the project. Scaled-down plans are now in the works, reducing corridor width from a proposed 1,200 feet to 600 feet.

A wait and see attitude might be the wisest. After all, the Dallas Morning News reports that Perry "suggested that the Texas Department of Transportation's decision to pull the plug on one of his biggest initiatives – the Trans Texas Corridor – was mostly a name change, and that public-private partnerships on toll roads would continue."

Read more...

Monday, December 8, 2008

New England Roundtable video online

Video of the first part of the 2005 New England Roundtable on popular governance is online at Blip.tv, here. The roundtable brought representatives from several communities to Burlington, Vermont, for a discussion on how the New England region can increase self-reliance and cooperation between communities in an age of increasing globalization. The roundtable was organied by Boston Cambridge Alliance chapter coordinator Dave Lewit, and presentations were taped by Victor Franke and edited by Boston Cambridge Alliance member Joanna Herlihy, and North Bridge member (and council ombudsperson) Cynthia Ritsher. Thanks to Cambridge Community Television (CCTV) for helping with use of editing facilities.

(As a CCTV volunteer, Joanna also taped this segment on a Cambridge "weatherization barn raising" organized by HEET (Home Energy Efficient Team) a Cambridge-based co-op.)

Read more...

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Deadline extended for comments on cell tower/antenna siting

The deadline for comments on new limitations to local authority to regulate cell tower and antenna citing has been extended to September 29.

If you didn't get a chance to comment please follow the links below to learn more about this industry-driven change, and weigh in with the Federal Communications Commission.

For background on this issue and links for talking points and updates, see a previous post on the Alliance e-news blog.

Then, take these actions before September 29:
Submit your comment electronically by clicking here: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi NOTE: In Box 1, for the "Proceeding" bar, type in 08-165. You can attach your comment as a PDF document, or you can type your comment directly into the box at the bottom of the page, but make a copy of it first, please!

Then send a copy of your comment to Citizens and Professionals for the Responsible Use of Electromagnetic Radiation at info@emrnetwork.org so they can track our collective effort, and do follow up. Or send them an email letting us know you've submitted a comment.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Action: Comment now on revisions to cell-phone tower siting standards

Here's an action alert from Kati Winchell, one of the founders of the Alliance for Democracy, who has been active on this issue for many years. The effects of the Telecommunications Act on local democracy were covered in early issues of Alliance Alerts (now Justice Rising).

Citizens and Professionals for the Responsible Use of Electromagnetic Radiation are asking that you comment on proposed regulatory changes that would make it harder for communities to have a say in where telecommunications corporations locate their cell phone towers or antennas.

Comments are due by Monday, September 15--there's not much time to weigh in on this issue. So ask the Federal Communications Commission to turn down the proposed change. For info on how to email your comments, see the EMR etwork site, here. For talking points, visit this page on the EMR Network site.

Some background: On July 11, 2008, CTIA, the trade association of the cellular telephone industry, petitioned the FCC to declare new limitations on local zoning authority as it affects cell tower and antenna siting, which, if approved, would pre-empt local ordinances and state laws. You can read a notice of the petition here.


Specifically, CTIA requests the FCC to:
  1. Force municipalities to act on wireless antenna or tower zoning applications within 45 or 75 days;
    Rule that applications are automatically "deemed granted" if a local government misses these deadlines;
  2. Prevent municipalities from considering the presence of service by other carriers in evaluating an additional carrier's application for an antenna site; and
  3. Preempt any local ordinance that would automatically require a variance for cell tower applications. (It appears that this would in effect preempt local wireless overlay districts, setbacks and height restrictions, thereby gutting existing local wireless bylaws.)

These proposed changes could lead to situations where wireless companies would be allowed to approach private individuals, including our neighbors, to site antennas on their property--without restriction. Given that these companies offer sizeable, yearly compensation for antenna space, many people would not be in a position to reject their offers. Property valuations would likely drop near such installations, and neighbor-to-neighbor acrimony would rise. Moreover, this would pave the way to increased exposure to microwave radiation where we live, work and play.

Exposure to electromagnetic radiation has been shown to cause biological disruption which can lead to a variety adverse health effects, including but not limited to childhood leukemia, adult brain tumors, childhood brain tumors, genotoxic effects (DNA damage and micronucleation), neurological effects and neurodegenerative disease, immune system disregulation, allergic and inflammatory responses, breast cancer in men and women, miscarriage and some cardiovascular effects.

This is not the first blow against local control of tower and antenna siting. Twelve years ago, the industry-driven 1996 Telecommunications Act (Section 704) struck a grave blow to local governing authority, resulting in the widespread build-out of the "seamless" network of cell phone towers and antennas nationwide that we see today. The '96 Telecom Act accomplished this by:
  1. Forcing towns to do business with any comparable wireless carriers that submit applications; to do otherwise is considered to be "discriminatory" practice, with legal consequences.
  2. Prohibiting towns and cities from banning wireless communication facilities (cell phone towers and antennas) in their communities; to do so is considered to be in violation of federal law.
  3. Reducing local governing authority to the comparatively marginal area of regulating antenna and tower placement through such means as overlay districts, setbacks, and tower height restrictions, etc.

Following the '96 Telecom Act, many towns and cities, though not all, crafted tower and antenna siting bylaws within these severe strictures. But the curtailments didn't end there. No bylaw, according to the Telecom Act, could be based on environmental impact, which is interpreted by the telecom industry to include human health effects. Even so, these local bylaws have been the last line of defense that communities could look toward for protection of their health, environment, and properties. And now, even this last remnant of local authority may be pre-empted, if the CTIA's petition is approved!


Please send a letter to the FCC by September 15, 2008, urging it to deny the CTIA's petition. If possible, please send a copy to the following to maximize the impact of your letter:
  • Your local governing boards - so they will notify their colleagues in other towns and cities
  • Your state representative and senator
  • Your Congressmen
  • Your City and local papers
  • The EMR Network --so we can track the effect of your letters. You can email your letter to info@emrnetwork.org
On August 22, Montgomery County, Maryland, and NATOA et al. filed motions to extend the comment deadlines. Check back at EMRnetwork.org for the latest on this issue.

Read more...

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Lawsuit targets Humboldt County (CA) Measure T

The Humboldt County Coalition for Community Rights and Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County have learned that Measure T, a groundbreaking local campaign finance ordinance, is being challenged in federal court.

The suit has been filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation, an anti-government, pro-big-business group, on behalf of Mercer-Fraser, Co., a construction company, and O&M Industries, a steel fabricator and manufacturer of heating systems. Pacific Legal is seeking an immediate injunction to halt Measure T prior to local elections in November.

Organizers write, "We understood that such a legal challenge could occur when we worked on the Measure T campaign, and we are working to create a plan of action. Constitutional law expert John Bonifaz, who pledged during the campaign to serve pro bono as special legal counsel to Humboldt's county counsel, has already confirmed his ability to do so."

Click "read more" to see the groups' press release.

EUREKA, CA - A groundbreaking law forbidding out-of-county controlled corporations from making political contributions in Humboldt County, CA elections was challenged in federal court this week. The Pacific Legal Foundation, an anti-government legal organization, filed suit on behalf of O&M Industries and Mercer Fraser Corporation over a local corporate reform and election integrity law. The Humboldt County Ordinance to Protect Fair Elections and Local Democracy was passed by citizens' initiative in June 2006 with 55% of the vote.

Known locally as "Measure T," the initiative was run by a broad coalition of community organizations, individuals and local businesses concerned by the growing influence of corporate power in elections. Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County, a local grassroots organization, spearheaded the effort by writing the initial legislation and the Humboldt Coalition for Community Rights campaigned for the law.

Upon passage, Measure T received national attention because it includes a direct challenge to "corporate personhood," which is the legal doctrine that allows a corporation to claim constitutional rights such as the First Amendment. Corporations have argued that the First Amendment protects their right to give political contributions.

"Money does not equal speech, and corporations should not be allowed to claim First Amendment rights - 'We the People' have an obligation to challenge unjust doctrines," said Democracy Unlimited Director Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap. "Measure T follows in the footsteps of the suffragists, the abolitionists and the Civil Rights activists who fought against segregation by challenging Supreme Court precedents that held unjust laws to be Constitutional."

“The County’s donation restriction runs the First Amendment through a shredder,” said Pacific Legal Foundation Attorney Damien Schiff in a press release. “The County’s ordinance is an outrageous assault on these free speech rights, because it targets a class of employers to be shut out of the political process.”

"Not true," said Sopoci-Belknap, "Measure T specifically protects an individual's right to participate in elections. It ensures that owners of corporations will operate as individuals in the political process, just like every other citizen, rather than gaining undue influence through their corporations."

The Pacific Legal Foundation is a Sacramento, California-based legal organization that was established March 5, 1973 to support pro-corporate causes. In recent years, it has taken a lead in pursuing anti-affirmative action policies. It is the key right-wing public interest litigation firm in a network of similar organizations funded to support big business and oppose environmental and health protection policies and government regulation.

Measure T opponents repeatedly threatened to sue to overturn the law if it passed. Billionaire financier Robin Arkley Jr., who is one of California Governor Schwarzenegger's largest contributors, sent a memo to the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors during the campaign warning them of a lawsuit after the measure qualified, and demanding they remove the measure from the ballot. Arkley's late father Robin Arkley, Sr., served on the Board of Trustees of the Pacific Legal Foundation.

"We are not surprised by this action, but we are certainly disappointed that the Pacific Legal Foundation has so little regard for the will of the people of Humboldt County," said Sopoci-Belknap. "Communities have the right and duty to protect our democracy. Voters enacted Measure T based on a legitimate concern that corporate influence in elections undermines the integrity of the process. Humboldt County has taken a stand for the rights of people and communities over the so-called 'rights' of corporations, and we ask other communities to stand with us."

Read more...

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Ruth Caplan talks to Ann Coiro about "David and Goliath" organizing

How do local organizations take on deep-pocket corporations and win? Ruth Caplan shared her perspectives on organizing Thursday on "The Green Show," on San Francisco's KKGN AM 960. She talked with host Angie Coiro about the need to go beyond the single issue or the single regulation to demand that the rights of communities and nature are protected first. She said she was inspired by the fact that the people who are stepping forward in these fights aren't "your normal progressive activists." They're often from "rural, conservative Republican communities who simply say 'wait a minute, we do not want corporations to come in and tell us what we can and can't do.'"

Ruth appears about halfway through Thursday's podcast, along with tenant organizer Dean Preston and environmentalist Christina Wong.

Read more...

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Local Democracy Bubbling in Tucson Thanks to “Sourdough Starters”

The "Sourdough Starters", an informal Democracy-loving group in Tucson, Arizona, hosted a Daniel Pennock Democracy School April 25-27 for 18 attendees who had interests in issues relating to water rights, mining, immigration, land use, peace & justice, and others.

Participants were unanimously grateful for the history and insights they gained and heartened by new feelings of hope engendered by the concept of rights-based organizing as it could be applied to their various issues.

They've met since the school to continue on the democracy organizing path together and to begin a process of studying and possibly changing Tucson's charter to make it a more grass-roots document, a possibility in a home-rule state like Arizona. Sourdough Starters C.J. Jones and Susan Willis are also AfD Southwest Regional Repsentatives. There is currently no AfD chapter established in Tucson but Susan and CJ will be working to establish one.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

September e-Newsletter

The Alliance for Democracy
E-News - September 5, 2007

Dear members and supporters,
This month’s newsletter features a new “Speak Out” section to bring recent news and commentary—underreported in the mainstream media— to your attention so you may write a letter to the editor to inform your community. Please also forward this newsletter to your lists!

We'd like to hear what you have to say too. Let us know when your letters are published. (It was great to hear from so many people calling, writing, or even visiting with congress members in response to our alert on Presidential Executive Order 13438, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq.” Thank you!)

AfD E-news now on-line!
Back issues of the Alliance for Democracy e-news are now available online—if you’re a recent subscriber or missed a few issues check out
afd-e-news.blogspot.com. There’s also a topic index to help you with back-issues searches.

Chapter and National News:

  • Convention invitations are in the mail!
  • Start democratic home rule—resist presidential orders
  • South Puget Sound Alliance for Democracy promotes public campaign financing
  • Indiana AfD hosts campaign finance reform forum
Action Alerts/Calendar:

  • Thursday, September 6: Congressional call-in day on Iraq war
  • Saturday, September 15: Impeach Bush and Cheney/End the War
  • September 22-29, Washington DC and Los Angeles: Occupy the Occupiers!

Speak out:

  • Will increased airstrikes and private soldiers lead to war in Iran?

News from our allies:

  • Yes! magazine features articles, resources on ending corporate power

Chapter and National News:
Convention invitations are in the mail!

Members, an info packet on AfD’s 7th National Convention is in the mail - or has already arrived in your mailbox!

We are very excited about the program planned for November 1-4 in Tucson, and hope you will be there with us. We also hope many AfD activists will attend the
Democracy School that precedes the convention, or can stay for the BorderLinks trip taking place after

Register Now! The “Early Bird” Special $60.00 registration is good until Sept. 30—and then make your plane reservations for the cheapest flight possible. See you there!

If you can't attend the convention, please consider supporting this event with a donation, or by renewing your AfD membership. Check the expiration date on your mailing label and renew on the registration form, or
online .

If you subscribe to this newsletter, but aren't an AfD member, see our website for info or
contact the office for a copy of the brochure.


Start democratic home rule—resist presidential orders
Dave Lewit and others of the Boston/Cambridge Alliance have developed a "Democracy Protection Kit"—a set of questions and articles for activists to engage local government and law enforcement officials about what steps they might take to implement or resist in response to a crackdown on civil liberties by the federal government. How will local officials weigh demands from federal agencies versus protecting the demands and rights of local people and their communities?

An out-of-control executive could conceivably use the Patriot Act, as well as recent Executive Orders to arrest or seize assets of anyone critical of White House policy. And a little-noted provision of the recently passed Defense Authorization Act allows President Bush to send the military to police any trouble spot in this country regardless of the wishes of state governors. This change to the Insurrection act has been criticized by, among others, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who sees a potential threat to the Constitution, and to local and state sovereignty. (read the story here )

It's urgent to start talking now with local officials about protecting our people, our rights, and our resources. Expand into active community debate. Pilot projects are under way in Boston MA, Taunton MA, Ipswich MA, and Sandpoint ID. Add your community.

The Democracy Protection Kit contains model letters and interview questions, pertinent articles on federal-local cooperation, the potential for a coup, and text of two recent executive orders—for volunteers (AfD'ers and allied groups—civic, college, church, labor, etc.) to use in conducting interviews and publicizing the results, in order to develop resistance to unwarranted federal demands. For a copy of the materials, download from www.NewEnglandAlliance.org or contact the office via e-mail or phone at 781-894-1179.


South Puget Sound Alliance for Democracy promotes public campaign financing
South Puget Sound AfD is working with Washington Public Campaigns to build support for public campaign financing, urging members and supporters to help with pledge gathering from candidates and office holders, and to collect signatures on a citizen petitions. For AfD members in Washington state who want more information or to volunteer for a number of needed jobs, e-mail Chapter Chair Jacqui Brown Miller at jacquiafd@comcast.net.

A fall educational event may be in the works as well.

And you can see the Reclaiming Democracy TV show on the web, at www.SoundDemocracy.org If you’re in Thurston County, watch it on TCTV, Channel 22, Mondays and Fridays at 6 p.m.


Indiana AfD hosts state-wide campaign finance reform forum
AfDers in the Mid-West - Don't forget to register by September 14 for this event organized by Chapter Chairs Stevie and Jack Miller and with Doris “Granny D” Haddock as distinguished guest speaker. For information and to register go to www.thealliancefordemocracy.org and click on the “more information” link under the notice on our home page.

The people are getting behind public funding! A bipartisan survey conducted this summer by Lake Research Partners and Bellwether Research found the following:
· Three out of four voters support a voluntary system of publicly funded campaigns, including federal elections.
· Support is bipartisan, with 80% of Democrats, 78% of independent/unenrolled and 65% of Republicans in favor.
· Voters look favorably on candidates who follow “clean election” guidelines, and would consider crossing party lines to vote for them.
· Voters believe publicly funded campaigns will help candidates win on ideas, not on bankrolls, and increase accountability to the public over corporate donors. They also believe it will allow regular citizens with good ideas to campaign for office, rather than just the very well-to-do.


Action Alerts/Calendar:
Thursday, September 6: Tell Congress to End the War in Iraq
Let’s welcome Congress back to work with a national call-in on Thursday, September 6, sponsored by United for Peace with Justice and its member groups, including the Alliance for Democracy. Call the Capitol Hill Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

This month, Congress votes on Bush’s request for about $190 billion in war funds. Remind your congress member that s/he doesn't have to pay for war. Congress doesn't even have to vote. And if they do, they can add restrictions, timelines, or other conditions to bring this war to an end. Want more information? See the
UFPJ site .

September 15, Washington DC: March to Impeach Bush and Cheney and End the War
September 15th is the expected date of Gen. David Petraeus’s progress report on the Iraq troop surge. The march takes advantage of the media spotlight to demand impeachment and peace. Local actions are being planned across the country. For info, see
www.impeachbush.org. To get your own “Impeach Cheney?” cap, see http://www.usalone.com/impeach_cheney_cap.php. Pick out the question mark to make a statement, leave it in to see what others think!

September 22-29, Washington DC and Los Angeles: Occupy the Occupiers!
Defend our rights! Don't let the government silence antiwar protest!
September 22 through 29: Encampment in front of Congress to STOP the war—parallel encampment in Los Angeles
September 29: National March on Washington and Demo in Los Angeles.
75+ Organizing Centers in 32 States - find one near you! 100 buses.
More than 1600 Endorsers – find a bus, an organizing center or a sponsoring group at http://www.troopsoutnow.org

<

Speak Out Now!
Will increased airstrikes and private soldiers lead to war in Iran?

The escalation of air strikes in Iraq with deadly consequences for civilians is occurring, but hardly reported in the U.S. Is Iran in the bombsights as well?

In the last seven months there has been a 500% increase in the volume of air attacks in Iraq. And in July, the Associated Press reported the Air Force has increased their inventory of attack and reconnaissance planes, and brought the B1-B bomber, capable of carrying 24 tons of bombs, back to Iraq. According to Iraq Body Count, more air attacks may have led to an increase in Iraqi civilian casualties—about 50 such deaths per month. (Read the AP story here)

Equally troubling, this air power can be turned on Iran, should Bush and Cheney find a good reason for a pre-emptive attack (via a false-flag operation?) writes Bernard Weiner in The Crisis Papers. According to Weiner, “former Middle East CIA specialist Bob Baer says senior intelligence officials told him recently that CheneyBush are likely to attack Iran within six months.” (read the story here)

If they attack, Weiner adds, they won't just have official US troops at their disposal, but 60,000 to 100,000 “independent contractors,” some of which are private security forces. These include the notorious Blackwater corporation, which is reportedly buying combat aircraft.

The harms of outsourcing military and intelligence operations are incalculable, writes Weiner. “These mercenaries swear allegiance to their employer, not to the rule of law, not to any constitution. The catastrophic damage done to democracy by the existence, and power, of these private forces can't be overstated.”

If this Speak Out Now! feature inspires you to “speak out,” please write a “Letter to the Editor” and e-mail a copy to the office. From the escalation of air strikes on Iraq and the US’s responsibility to account for civilian casualties to the need to stop a a pre-emptive attack on Iran and prevent the spread of war throughtout the Middle East, to exposing the use of private “mercenaries” in war and war profiteering – there’s plenty to write about! Choose a topic and write a short and cogent letter. Now’s the time to prove that the pen is mightier than the sword!


News from our allies:
Yes! magazine features articles, resources on ending corporate power

This month’s YES! Magazine urges you to “Stand Up to Corporate Power” with a great selection of articles focusing on corporate rule. Check it out online at www.yesmagazine.org to read some of the articles and request a free copy. You can also request free copies of the magazine for your organization.

Don't miss Doug Pibel on community-based democracy initiatives, including the water and anti-corporate personhood statute passed by Barnstead, New Hampshire with the help of Ruth Caplan, of AfD’s Defending Water for Life campaign, and Barnstead resident Gail Darnell, now AfD campaign coordinator for New Hampshire.

Other articles focus on anti-corporate activists, progressive companies, new ways to think about the corporation, and ways of educating your community about corporate power and personhood, including links to movies and a variety of national and grassroots organizations.



Read more...