Showing posts with label Maine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maine. Show all posts

Monday, July 15, 2013

Come to the Earth Democracy Conference at the Democracy Convention, August 7-11, in Madison

National and international policies based on neoliberal economics, corporate globalization, and "free" trade which aim to commodify, privatize and profit from almost every aspect of nature are destroying local communities and cultures, and the ecosystems on which all life depends. Earth Democracy is juxtaposed to this system and is grounded in the inherent rights of living beings and Mother Earth.

The Earth Democracy Conference will be one of several tracks at this year's Democracy Convention, to be held August 7 through 11 at Madison College, Madison Wisconsin. Earth Democracy  builds on the declaration adopted by the Ecojustice People's Movement Assembly at the 2010 US Social Forum which states: "We support the conclusion that only by 'living well', in harmony with each other and with Mother Earth, rather than 'living better,' based on an economic system of unlimited growth, dominance and exploitation, will the people of this planet not only survive but thrive."

The Earth Democracy Conference will bring together people who are working on the frontlines of the ecojustice movement to:

  • democratize the electric grid and finance local renewable energy
  • expose the corporatization of the "green" economy agenda
  • recognize water as a fundamental right of people and nature
  • combat global warming through creative action
  • overcome corporate influence on school curricula and pursue earth-friendly curricula

Sessions include (full descriptions coming soon!): 
Thursday, August 8th- Sunday, August 11th
Awakening the Dreamer Symposium with The Pachamama Alliance Community

Action Tool Kit for Earth Democracy with Randa Solick and Ellen Murtha, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom

Guardianship of Future Generations & Rights and Responsibilities of Present Generations/Writing Earth Rights into Law with Carolyn Raffensperger, Science and Environmental Health Network and Linda Sheehan, Earth Law Center Energy

Injustice & Environmental Racism: How Dirty Energy Impacts Communities with Mike Ewall Energy Justice Network

Teaching Earth Democracy with Erica Krug, Dan Walkner, and Susan Friess, Madison Public School Teachers

Powering up for People, Peace and the Planet: Re-envisioning the Climate Movement: Building Resistance, Collaboration, Transformation with Victor Wallis, writer on ecology and politics, Sherri Mitchell, Land Peace Foundation (Maine), Stephanie Kimball, 350.org-Madison, and Jill Stein

The Climate of Justice: Asserting our Human, Civil and Earth Rights with Lauren Regan, Civil Liberties Defense Center, Sherri Mitchell, and Jill Stein

Activist Training: Know Your Rights with Lauren Regan

Big Extraction/Big Pollution/Bigger Resistance with representatives from frontline Indigenous and local communities fighting the XL and Enbridge pipelines, sand pits, Penokee Hills Taconite Mine, Rio Tinto Eagle Mine and high capacity water pumping and David Cobb on community rights vs. corporate rights

Re-Envisioning the Climate Movement: Building Resistance, Collaboration, Transformation with Victor Wallis, Sherri Mitchell, and Jill Stein

Water for Life: Local Ordinances to Protect Water, Springs and Rivers with Jane Goddard Center for Earth Jurisprudence and Linda Sheehan

Contours of an Ecologically Sound Economy with Chris Wallace, writer on the ecological crisis and the commons, Rachel Smolker Biofuelwatch, and Mike Ewall

Stop the World’s Largest Trade Agreement’s Harm to the Earth, Agriculture and Food Systems with Jim Goodman, Family Farm Defenders, George Naylor, National Family Farm Coalition and others to be announced

Next Stage: Building the Movement for People, Peace and the Planet – From #Fearless Summer to Fearless All Year Round – dynamic group participant discussion

Alliance for Democracy, Green Action, and the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom thare the principal conveners of the Earth Democracy Conference. Contact Nancy Price at nancytprice39@gmail.com for more info.

Read more...

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Jobs and the environment in Maine: finding common ground and promoting alternatives to extraction

Last month, Lance Tapley of the Portland (ME) Phoenix wrote a feature entitled "Maine's environmental movement reinvents inself for a new era of challenges." This story slipped under our radar, but it's worth reading, since the challenges Tapley details are very much ongoing and tied to globalization and the multinational corporatist view that Maine, like other not-terribly-wealthy, not-terribly-developed locations, is just a hodgepodge of commodities waiting to be mined, cut, pumped, packaged, and sold, via privately-operated, publicly-funded infrastructure.

The whole article can be found here, but here's an excerpt, featuring Chris Buchanan, organizer for our Defending Water in Maine campaign. If your community or city has ever had to swallow an unwholesome economic project because "it will create jobs," you'll be glad to find out that more and more people are discussing just what kind of jobs they want to create, and whether big-budget, high-impact, environmentally-damaging, resource-extracting, and Wall Street-enriching development is going to provide them.

A big contribution of the new people in the environment movement is their talk about the need for economic alternatives to the big threats. In the history of Maine environmentalism, this is an uncommon conversation — as a rule, the fight has been reactive.

The discussion has arisen because almost all development plans rely on a single argument: jobs — a forceful one in a poor state.

To be sure, environmentalists have long spoken about how Maine's tourism industry will be protected by preservation of the environment — an argument freshly made by Thanks But No Tank. And they propose economic alternatives such as less-environmentally-damaging energy sources —decentralized solar, wind, tidal, and small hydro —as a counter to nuclear, coal, oil, and giant dams.

Those suggestions, however, are neither comprehensive responses to Maine's general lack of good jobs nor specific alternatives to many job-promising industrial proposals.

But now Chris Buchanan, the statewide coordinator of Stop the East-West Corridor, is promoting local cooperatives, putting "workers and the environment first rather than the bottom line." She cites historical models — Franklin D. Roosevelt's rural electrical cooperatives created in the Great Depression — as well as current ones — the ubiquitous credit unions; Fedco, the Maine garden-supply co-op; and, in Spain, the Mondragon corporation, a co-op federation that has been a mainstay, she says, of that country's economy throughout its current crisis.

Recently, at an anti-East-West-corridor meeting that saw 60 people attend in the tiny village of Parkman, in Piscataquis County, the cooperatives idea was a central topic and, she and others say, was well received. This type of business "does well because workers are happy and motivated," Buchanan says. Usually, workers own the cooperatives.

The economic-alternatives conversation is spreading. Charles Fitzgerald, a successful businessman, talks about local, "agrarian" economic development. He mentions small farmers and a cheese-maker in his area.

Still, there's no real economic plan articulated by the anti-highway folk — or by others in the grass roots. "Nothing concrete yet," Jim Freeman says. Buchanan admits the cooperative idea requires a lot of public education.

Especially, there's no alternative to corporate plans for Maine's vast forest, its largest resource, which figures in many environmental battles and is owned by large, distant corporations — increasingly, by Wall Street investment firms with a hunger for immediate profits.

The last time Maine environmentalists took a big step toward an economic alternative for the forest was the Ban Clearcutting citizen-initiated referendum campaign of the 1990s, which Jonathan Carter directed. If industrial clearcutting were banned, labor-intensive forestry would have to be practiced.
Although the ban was highly popular at the start of the battle, it was beaten down by millions of dollars of fear-inducing advertising by the forest industry (about, of course, jobs). Most Maine politicians, Democrats as well as Republicans — and even the NRCM and Maine Audubon — didn't support the ban (though the Sierra Club did). (Disclosure: the author was involved in the Ban Clearcutting campaign.)

The clearcutting battle demonstrated how, when public fears are raised about jobs — or when more jobs are promised — Democratic politicians are not certain votes for the environment.

There were some Democratic votes last year for relaxing the mining law and for the public funding, to the tune of $300,000, of a Maine Department of Transportation study of the East-West Highway's feasibility, even though Cianbro's Vigue had alleged the highway-corridor was to be created only with private funds.

Until there are well-thought-out and clearly articulated alternative economic plans for Maine's future, however — and perhaps some appealing politicians enunciating them—the environmental movement will always be, fundamentally, playing defense.

Read more...

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Corporate personhood: don't regulate, eliminate!


Bonnie Preston, one of the Alliance's vice co-chairs, was one of the resource speakers at a recent teach-in at the University of Maine-Orono. Bonnie has been an active organizer for local food and self-governance ordinances in her part of Maine. She spoke alongside BJ McAllister, of Maine Clean Elections. Maine's governor is no fan of the state's clean election system, and has attempted to defund it. 

Here's what Bonnie said to the group:

Good afternoon! My name is Bonnie Preston, and I am a member of the Alliance for Democracy, which believes that the overarching task of our time is to get our democratic republic out of the hands of the mega-corporations and back into the hands of We the People.

Money in politics is not just about elections and how they are financed. More insidiously, it is about the two arms of the revolving door--lobbying and corporate capture of the agencies of government. It’s hard to pin down the number of lobbyists in Washington DC right now, but it is certainly dozens for each of our elected representatives in Congress. Many of these are former elected officials. For example, Billy Tauzin led the fight to pass a Medicare prescription drug plan that forbade negotiating prices with the drug manufacturers. After that signature achievement, he went to work for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturing of America (PhRMA), the lobbying arm of the drug industry, where he became the highest paid health-law lobbyist in the country.

The flip side of people leaving government for lobbying is leaving the private sector to work for a government agency, temporarily of course. Exhibit A is Michael Taylor, who has moved back and forth from Monsanto to either the FDA or USDA for decades. He is now in charge of writing the regulations that will support the Food Safety Modernization Act, now in final draft form. If implemented, these rules could put an end to small farms in the US.

These two forces are driving the complete take-over of government by the private sector, and no campaign finance reform will touch this.

So what can we do to get the government back in our hands? The Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court galvanized people so dramatically that it has opened a door to a possibility that many of us who have worked for years on this issue have seen as a distant hope, if not a pipe dream. Since 1886, the Supreme Court has granted corporations more and more specific constitutional rights; corporations have used these to increase their political power.

The founders kept corporations under control. Corporate charters, required to show how the corporation would serve the public interest, had to be approved by state legislatures. They were limited in time and scope, had to be extended if desired by the legislatures, and could be revoked if the corporation failed to serve the public. A corporation could not buy another corporation, so they must stay small and competitive.

Today, monopolistic corporations, which include the too-big-to-fail Wall Street banks, are preventing progress on everything we need to do if we are going to continue to live on this planet. The rights we have given them are even being enshrined in international law through the World Trade Organization and the NAFTA-style trade agreements. This trade regime is culminating in the Trans Pacific Partnership, a trade agreement with all the powers of NAFTA, but with a significant difference. Once in place, countries will not have to negotiate a trade deal; they will simply sign on to the TPP. The multi-national corporations, with the enforcement powers of the trade organizations backed by the military might of supposedly democratic governments, are growing into a force that will totally destroy our ability to govern ourselves in a humane and environmentally sound way.

We must directly confront corporations and the concept of corporate personhood. A Constitutional amendment that ends corporate personhood as well as the concept that money is not speech is necessary. Abraham Lincoln did not try to regulate slavery, or end it in steps, or disclose its evils. He backed the 13th amendment, which freed the slaves. We are still cleaning up the mess created by slavery, and we will have a lot of work to do to clean up the messes that corporations have made as well, but a Constitution that says that corporations are not persons with constitutional rights will provide the solid ground we can stand on as we do that work. AfD, a founding partner of the Move to Amend coalition, is committed to this type of systemic change.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Water work in Maine: State agencies may bypass the bottle, and opposition to the E/W Corridor continues

Even in Maine where Nestle seems to reign supreme with its Poland Spring bottled water brand topping all spring water brand sales in the country, there has been legislative pushback against bottled water. In late February, Chris Buchanan, AfD’s Maine coordinator for Defending Water for Life, testified at a state legislative hearing on LD 315: An Act to Ban the Purchase of Bottled Water by State Agencies. Her testimony in favor of the bill was very well received and she has been asked to return for the work session on the bill. It would still be very surprising if the bill becomes law, but having the discussion is an important step forward.

Meanwhile, organizing against the East/West SuperCorridor continues full steam ahead. On March 2, the town of Dexter held a forum on the Corridor with two hundred people in attendance. Chris and others with Stop the E/W Corridor were on the panel. Once again, Cianbro, the corporation proposing the Corridor, declined an invitation to attend.

The proposed corridor is generating strong local opposition, with interest growing in taking a rights-based approach for local self-governance which denies corporations court-conferred constitutional rights and protects the rights of nature. Defending Water helped with scholarships so local activists could attend two 2-day Democracy Schools in early March where they are delving deeply into this approach. The Alliance set a national precedent when we worked with Barnstead NH which passed the first rights-based ordinance to protect their water from corporate takings. We hope to see this approach expand in Maine which already has two Barnstead-style local laws in Shapleigh and Newfield.

For more information go to www.defendingwater.net/maine and www.stopthecorridor.org.

Read more...

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Upcoming hearing on agreement between Nestlé Waters and Fryeburg, Maine


Defending Water for Maine organizer Chris Buchanan writes:
There will be a public hearing in Fryeburg, Maine on Thursday, March 7, 6pm on Nestlé's proposed long term contract with the Fryeburg Water Company, a public utility. The hearing will take place at the Fryeburg Legion Hall on Bradley Street across from the Fryeburg Academy gym next to the baseball field.

Everyone who is concerned about the future of our water resources should be present for this public hearing. If this unprecedented large-scale long-term contract goes through between Nestlé Waters North America (Poland Spring) and the Fryeburg Water Company with the blessing of the Public Utility Commission, it will be a precedent setting standard for corporate water extraction from a public water supply in the United States.

Do you want the Fryeburg Water Company locked into a 45 year contract with Nestlé, the largest food and beverage corporation in the world with such a tarnished track record? The cementing of this contract will effect our region in how our water resources will be allocated for our next generation. We face too many environmental instabilities and other variables on the horizon to responsibly agree to this.

We need you all there! Our future water security depends on you.

Please "Like" our Facebook page to stay connected and educated.

Ten things you should know about Nestle / Poland Spring

1. Bottled water is one of the company's key strategic money makers: Nestlé has an annual turnover of about 114 billion – of which almost 10% is derived from the bottled water business.

2. Nestlé has achieved world dominance in the bottled water business by taking over other leading brands as Perrier.

3. Nestlé is constantly buying up additional valuable groundwater resources in order to satisfy the massive demand it has created for bottled water.

4. Nestlé is taking advantage of the often out-of-date water rights in many locations by operating to the limits of legality, not just in developing countries but also in the USA and elsewhere in the industrialized world.

5. Nestlé spares no effort in exerting financial, legal and political pressure on anyone campaigning for water ownership as a public property and human right.

6. Nestlé is using up precious natural water resources to create and commercialize "new" water.

7. Nestlé promotes bottled water with extensive global marketing and advertising campaigns, undermining awareness for the necessity of a functioning public water supply system.

8. Nestlé promotes itself as a benefactor by donation and PR campaigns at local level. But at the same time it manipulates public opinion into believing that improvements in production and distribution are having a sustainable effect.

9. Nestlé creates dependence on bottled water, in particular where public waters supplies are close to collapse, and notably in developing countries.

10. Nestlé's bottled water business is not simply a business like any other. It is a business with the sole natural resource essential for man's survival.

Read more...

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Public comment period extended on potential Maine water deal; but a public hearing is needed too

Attention Maine residents... Yes, the good news is that the Maine Public Utility Commission has extended the comment period on the proposed new deal between Fryeburg Water Company and Nestlé/Poland Spring. The new deadline is September 24. You can read our previous alert here.

Thanks to everyone who took action to let the PUC know that the public has a right to more time to speak! We are pleased that the Public Advocate’s office called for an extension and give a special shout out to Nisha Swinton with Food and Water Watch who formally petitioned the PUC for an extension.

Now we have to demand a public hearing to force open the door and let the light shine on the backroom deal that the Fryeburg Water Company has struck with Nestlé/Poland Spring.  We know that a public hearing is not a part of the formal record used to decide the case, but neither are decisions made in a vacuum.  The PUC Commissioners need to know that there is widespread objection to this deal.

All three Commissioners have been far too cozy with Nestlé. In our first alert, we called out PUC Chairman Thomas Welch and Commissioner David Littell who both previously worked at Pierce, Atwood which has a long history of representing Nestlé. We should have also mentioned that the third commissioner, Mark Vannoy, worked as an Associate Vice President in the infrastructure and civil practice group at Wright Pierce where he had close associations with Nestlé.

Nestlé has no right to the water for the next 45 years. Fryeburg Water Company has no right to guaranteed profits from selling the spring water to Nestlé.

As a nun once said to a VP of NWNA when we were invited inside after protesting outside,  “Nestlé Water North America….who says the water belongs to you?  It belongs to God.”  Some might say the water belongs to all life.

Water is a fundamental right for people and nature.  Nestlé’s profit should not come before this fundamental right.

ACT TODAY: Call PUC Attorney Matthew Kaply (207) 287-1368 who is in charge of this case. Thank him for the extension and insist on a public hearing.

You can also call or e-mail Karen Geraghty, PUC Administrative Director to whom formal requests are made.  Again, thank her for the extension and insist on a public hearing. Her phone number is  207-287-3831, or email karen.geraghty [at] maine.gov

As before, you can sign in as a registered public user on the PUC website and post specific comments which will go to the staff and Commissioners. http://www.maine.gov/mpuc/online/index.shtml   Put in Case No. 2008-00052

The pdf of the filed agreement is here.

Thanks for all you do!
Ruth Caplan and Chris Buchanan
Defending Water for Life in Maine

Read more...

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Are you a Maine resident? Tell the Public Utilities Commission "no deals with Nestlé in Fryeburg"

Ruth Caplan and Chris Buchanan of Defending Water in Maine report: 
We’ve just learned that the private Fryeburg Water Company wants to seal a deal with Nestlé/Poland Spring to guarantee that Nestlé buys at least 75 million gallons of spring water per year for the next 25 years with the option to extend for up to four additional five-year terms – a total of 45 years.

According to a news story in the Conway Daily Sun on Friday, “The two companies have had a state-approved agreement since 2008, but the proposed changes mean the agreement will need to be reviewed by the Maine Public Utilities Commission.”

The newspaper reports: “The PUC announced it is currently accepting public comment on the proposal. The comment period is open through Sept. 4.”

There are many reasons to oppose a private contract requiring Nestlé to buy "at least 75 million gallons per year." But the first step is to call for an extension of time for public comment and for a public hearing.

ACT TODAY! 

Call PUC Attorney Matthew Kaply (207) 287-1368 who is in charge of this case and demand that the public comment period be extended at least to the end of September. Also call for a public hearing.

You can also sign in as a registered public user on the PUC website and post specific comments which will go to the staff and Commissioners.

Here are a few talking points.
• The public comment period must be extended at least to the end of September. The original period of two weeks during peak vacation time and over Labor Day weekend is totally unacceptable.

• The issues need to be aired in a public hearing, not just hidden away on the PUC website.

• PUC Chairman Thomas Welch and Commissioner Littell should recuse themselves from this case due to their past association with Pierce, Atwood which has a long history of representing Nestlé. Commissioner Littell was an attorney at Pierce, Atwood from 1992-2003, the last four years as a partner.

• Water is a fundamental right for people and nature. Nestlé’s profit should not come before these fundamental rights.

• Only the Fryeburg Water Company will get to decide if there is a water shortage in Fryeburg allowing less water to be sold to Nestlé, not the local residents or businesses. Then only for 60 days! FWC has a financial interest in denying there is any shortage. Town residents and local businesses will suffer while Nestlé will have its guaranteed 75 million gallons per year to bottle and ship around the country.

• This proposed 25-year contract would set a precedent for the state. Nestlé could refer to this in future cases anywhere in the state.

• The PUC must reject this proposed agreement. Here is the pdf of the filed agreement.

Thanks! Ruth and Chris

Read more...

Monday, July 16, 2012

Defending Water in Maine takes on the proposed East-West Corridor

The Defending Water in Maine campaign will be holding several East-West Corridor informational events across the state during July and August. The latest list is here on the campaign website, along with the first of a two-part video report on the planned super-corridor.

In May, a full house packed the Foxcroft Academy auditorium in Dover-Foxcroft to hear Peter Vigue, CEO of Cianbro, a construction company that stands to make millions off the supercorridor, which would consist of a private toll road for tractor-trailer trucks, as well as pipelines and power lines. Many of the 1000 people at the hearing wore hunter orange hats or shirts to protest the project.

Opposition to the project has come from farmers, hunters, environmentalists, and local landowners. Chris Buchanan, of Defending Water in Maine who also coordinates the state wide coalition, points out that constructing the highway opens the door to more extractive industry: “If it was built, it would open up areas of Maine that are currently very difficult to get to for companies like Nestlé to mine for water and sell it on the global market.”

 

Read more...

Monday, April 2, 2012

Upcoming Defending Water in Maine events

Stop by one of these events. Learn about threats to Maine's water and wilderness and get involved with building community rights to protect resources and sustainability. For more information, see the Defending Water for Maine website.

Thursday, April 5, 6:00 to 8:30 p.m.
"Tapped" Film Showing and Discussion
New Forest Institute, 66 Monroe Highway, Brooks, Maine 04921
(207) 722-3625

Saturday, April 14-Monday, April 16
Youth Activist Gathering. Workshop on Rights-Based Ordinances
729 Lakeview Drive, South China, Maine 04358
Learn more at maineyag.wordpress.com

Saturday, April 21, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Tabling at HOPE Festival, also possible presentation on East-West Corridor
Student Recreation and Fitness Center
University of Maine in Orono, Orono, Maine
For more information, www.peacectr.org

Friday, April 28, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Tabling at Waterville Earth Day Celebration
Barrels Community Market, downtown Waterville, Maine

Read more...

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

No East-West Corridor: Protest "Gateway to Opportunity" Luncheon 

LD 1671, An Act To Provide Funding to the Department of Transportation for a Feasibility Study for an East-West Highway, was approved by the House and Senate last week.  Now it’s time to up the ante.

Cianbro President Peter Vigue and Maine DOT Commissioner David Bernhardt are being hosted by the Town of St. Stephen, New Brunswick, Canada, to share “his vision of transportation for Maine” at a noon luncheon.  Defending Water for Maine plans to show up at the lunch to share our vision of Maine without a supercorridor.

The luncheon will be held on Thursday, March 29, starting at 11:45 Atlantic/10:45 Eastern, 405 Milltown Boulevard, St. Stephen, New Brunswick Canada at the St. Patrick's Church Hall (map link)

If you want to join Defending Water for Maine in St. Stephen, please contact Chris Buchanan, 207-257-1443 or chris(at)defendingwater(dot)net. An outside protest is planned--bring your passport to cross the border. Please contact Chris if you can help with media, film the action or loan a video camera, help with carpooling, or if you need a ride.

There is also a strategy meeting tomorrow (Wednesday) at 6pm at the Newport Entertainment Center, 26 Main St., Newport, Maine.

More info: www.defendingwater.net/maine/east-west-highway/

Read more...

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Would the East-West Highway also be used to connect Canadian fracking fields and the proposed Searsport LPG tank?

by Chris Buchanan, Defending Water for Life in Maine

With Canada developing natural gas fracking fields in Quebec and New Brunswick and a LPG (liquid petroleum gas) tank proposed for Searsport, serious questions have arisen as to whether the proposed East-West Highway might be destined to become a super-corridor to transport LPG in trucks to Canada and natural gas by pipeline along the highway to the Maritime Provinces for export. Here’s why we are concerned.

The East-West Highway route through Maine connects both the Canadian fracking fields directly adjacent to Maine so it could be highly profitable for the investors in the East-West Highway to run a natural gas pipeline along the highway from the Canadian natural gas fracking fields to the Canadian Maritimes. This would provide even greater returns for highway investors, in addition to tolls they would receive from Canadian transport trucks.

The proposed Searsport LPG storage facility comes into the picture because of new fracking technology developed by GasFrac, a Canadian energy company, which uses a thick gel made from propane, rather than water, to force the natural gas out of the shale rock. LPG is a mixture of propane and butane.

“This is a game changer for the industry,” says Don LeBlanc in a November 15, 2011 article in Chemistry World. LeBlanc is the “principal consultant at Eastex Petroleum Consultants in Halifax, Nova Scotia, who has been involved in shale gas trials with gelled propane in New Brunswick, Canada.” So far gelled propane has been used about 1,000 times mostly in Canada.

From an investor’s prospective, under this scenario a LPG tank in Searsport is a great idea. From there, they can truck the propane to Canada via the East-West highway to use for fracking shale gas. Then the natural gas produced by the fracking could be transported to the Canadian Maritimes via a pipeline built along the East-West Highway.

Indeed, Peter Vigue of Cianbro announced his vision to use the highway as a multi-use corridor during his presentation to the Maine Legislature’s Transportation Committee during the public hearing on Valentine’s Day.

This larger energy scheme would benefit private investors, but lead to further exploitation of Maine as a supercorridor throughway with only two proposed exits for the whole state. Yet the people of Maine would have no voice in how this private toll road was built or managed. Nor would the state and federal regulatory agencies be concerned with the environmental impacts of fracking or the safety of the new technology using highly flammable propane.

This is a highly organized energy triad, poised to make a few people very wealthy at the cost of Maine’s people and the land we need to survive. We were confused why Searsport selectmen were supporting the East-West highway, but now it is clear how the pieces can fit together in a highly profitable way.

Instead of locking Mainers into a supercorridor dissecting the state for foreign profit, our legislators need to step back and identify what the people of Maine need to thrive over the long haul. Prioritizing Canadian businesses and multinational corporations that do raw resource extraction, is not the way. Public funding for private investment, at the added cost of individual rights and local control, is not the way. We need to create a long-term vision that values Maine’s strengths—how we can benefit from our priceless ecological beauty and how best to use Mainers creativity, work ethic and passion to create lasting jobs for the people and families of Maine.

Read more...

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Rally in Augusta, Maine, to stop the proposed East-West highway

Attention water allies! Defending Water for Life in Maine is planning a rally with multiple groups all over the state to demonstrate opposition to the proposed East-West highway, a privately-constructed toll road that would cross the wilderness part of the state, speeding the corporate exploitation of Maine's forests and water, and allowing Canadian transport fast access to eastern ports.

The rally is scheduled for 12 noon, Valentine's Day, February 14, outside the State House in Augusta. At 1pm, LD 1671, An Act To Provide Funding to the Department of Transportation for a Feasibility Study of an East-west Highway, is scheduled for a public hearing and Defending Water in Maine plans to be there. Organizers are looking for turnout and volunteers to make the rally a success, so contact organizers below if you can lend a hand.

What's wrong with the proposed East-West Highway?

1)  It is unethical to use taxpayer money to fund a private project.  The east-west highway would be a private toll road.

2)  The project does not bring any benefit to Maine. Its primary use will be as a highly expensive toll road for Canadian transport trucks heading to east coast ports. It's not for Mainers, or even tourists.

3)  The project exposes Maine to be used for foreign companies for profit at the expense of our people and ecosystems. The highway would open Maine up to resource exploitation like water mining and wood chip export by multinational corporations that provide very few jobs if any, do not spend their profits in Maine, and do not pay taxes here. In return, most Mainers will lose access to affordable land to make a living on, and Maine's tourist appeal will be reduced, affecting a significant source of income for Mainers.

4)  The project will not create many jobs. This is a private project. During construction, more people may get hired temporarily. However, as Cianbro, the construction firm currently backing the highway, regularly performs huge infrastructure projects all over New England, we expect they will provide a high percentage of the work force.  Many Cianbro employees live in Maine, and that is great, but we're not looking at new job creation here, beyond a few jobs pumping gas. Extractive industries, like producing wood chips for export to Europe, and jobs mining or bottling water, provide very few jobs compared to other local land uses.

5)  The construction of the highway, over three major rivers, multiple wetlands, and through old growth forest would be very damaging to the environment.

There is also a planned Pre-Rally Rendevouz at 9am, Tuesday, February 14 in Belgrade. Meet to develop solid talking points, strategize the overall approach, make posters, and inspire each other! For info, email Defending Water in Maine organizer Chris Buchanan at chris@defendingwater.net

For more info on the highway see this page on the Defending Water for Maine website.

Thanks to Chris Buchanan for sending this info!

Read more...

Monday, January 23, 2012

Occupy the Courts: Bangor

More than 50 people rallied at the Margaret Chase Smith Federal Building in Bangor to mark the second anniversary of the Citizens United decision. Protestors included nine "supreme court judges" in black robes, five of which also sported sashes bedecked with corporate logos.

Occupy groups in Bangor, Ellsworth and Blue Hill organized the event, including Alliance member Starr Gilmartin and AfD vice co-chair Bonnie Preston. Bonnie spoke on the need to eliminate all corporate access to constitutional rights, and the importance of defending the right to pass local rights-based ordinances to claim sovereignty of people over corporations, as has been done in some towns in Maine and New Hampshire to protect water from exploitation by bottlers, and to defend farm-to-table food sales and local farms in five Maine towns last spring.

The keynote speaker was Rob Shetterly, an artist from Brooksville who's painted a series of portraits, Americans Who Tell the Truth. Rob travels all over the country to speak in schools and libraries about his portraits, and picks a small group of paintings, which generally have a unifying theme, to take to each talk. Here's what he said at the rally:

You may know about the huge lion that waddled into the Fat Cats restaurant & sat down & yelled at the waiter, “I’ll take the zebra! Don’t cook it. Bring me the whole thing.” So, the waiter dragged over the zebra carcass & the lion went to work, gnawing, ripping, tearing, & gulping down the muscles and organs, the head, the eyes & ears, the hooves, & finally chewing up & swallowing all the bones. Then the lion, blood dripping still from his jaws, motioned to the waiter. When the waiter came over, the lion belched & said, “Well, if you are what you eat, I must be a zebra now!” And then he laughed so hard at his own joke, he fell off his chair.

This is exactly what has happened to democracy in this country, and the fat cats are still laughing. Capitalism swallowed democracy and claimed that a vanished democracy is capitalism. That capitalism, an exploitative economic system, not democracy, an egalitarian political system, is what guarantees our rights and fulfills our dreams. But it did not have to be that way, and it doesn’t now. As Ashley Sanders, one of the Occupy Movements organizers & theoreticians says, Capitalism is not inevitable. Poverty is not inevitable. In other words, they’re fallible. They can be fought, resisted. In that sense, Occupy is not an occupation, but a giant exercise in decolonization. It’s a battle to oust the false masters of our minds.

Back in the 1930s after an economic boom & bust eerily similar to the cycle we are in now, the great Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, “You can have democracy, or you can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of the few. You cannot have both.”

Why is that true? It’s true because great wealth translates into power, the power of control and influence, the power that buys the major media and shapes the message to its benefit making democracy impossible --- a people who aren’t informed of the truth by objective media are incapable of being good citizens. It’s the power that bribes both political parties and creates a system subservient to it; it’s a power in the banking industry and on Wall Street that gambles with people’s money to the benefit of the banks and the detriment of the people. It’s the power to control the history our children are taught, the power to commodify every aspect of our lives including our children’s dreams and imaginations so that all of our sacred contracts we make with the future in order to perpetuate the health of our minds, our bodies, and our communities are exchanged for contracts for profit taking. It’s the power to ensure that there is no real accountability for the crimes of that wealth, the crimes that decimate landscape, eliminate species, promote wars, exploit people and resources and poison the environment, and lastly, it’s the power to write the laws to protect that wealth’s power behind impregnable walls of special interest legal mumbo jumbo.

As Howard Zinn said, The rule of law does not do away with the unequal distribution of wealth and power, but reinforces that inequality with the authority of law. It allocates wealth and poverty in such calculated and indirect ways as to leave the victim bewildered.

It’s the kind of absurd mumbo jumbo that made the stealing of an election legal in 2000, that allows corporations to privatize profit and socialize cost, register in the Cayman Islands & pay no tax, and pervert the Constitution so that they have the rights of full personhood and their money has free speech. Giving a corporation personhood is like having your body invaded by an insidious disease, a disease which replicates and infiltrates every system of your body --- your heart, your brain, your lungs --- and then the disease says to you, You can see how powerful I am, how integrated I am into your well being, I think you better defer to me on all future decisions if you know what’s best. And instead of taking a huge dose of antibiotics, you say, Right, of course, you are a lot stronger and more powerful than I am, I’ll name you my executor right now.

Richard Grossman, who died in November, and worked for many years at the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, & who understood how dangerous legalized corporate power is, how it annuls democratic rights, said, You want sanity, democracy, community, an intact Earth? We can't get there obeying Constitutional theory and law crafted by slave masters, imperialists, corporate masters, and Nature destroyers. We can't get there kneeling before robed lawyers stockpiling class plunder precedent up their venerable sleeves. So isn't disobedience the challenge of our age? Principled, inventive, escalating disobedience to liberate our souls, to transfigure our work as humans on this Earth.

In 1963, in front of the Lincoln Memorial, Martin Luther King, Jr., defined the American Dream. He didn’t measure that dream in quantities of consumption, or in enemies vanquished. He didn’t tout American entitlement nor defend Manifest Destiny. Dr. King defined the Dream in terms of the “riches of freedom and the security of justice.” You see, the wealthy and powerful would have us today lavish praise on Dr. King, but turn his words inside out, invert them so that our Dream should be the freedom of riches and the justice of security. If you aspire to the freedom of riches, then you also believe that exploitation is necessary. Not everyone can share equally in that freedom. Some are more worthy than others. And you want to instruct your court system to solidify that freedom of riches into law. And if you believe in the justice of security, you believe in fear, that anything that keeps you safe --- more war, more torture, more secrecy, more spying, more fear, more suspicion --- is good. The security of justice keeps you secure because it guarantees the same justice for everyone. The justice of security is the frightened privileged building walls around their huge slice of pie.

What is so important and powerful about the Occupy Movement is that it demands the Dream that Dr. King envisioned. It understands what Thoreau meant when he said, The law will never make men free, it is men who have got to make the law free. The Occupy Movement understands what Frederick Douglass meant when he said, Find out what any people will quietly submit to, and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong that will be imposed on them. We have submitted for so long to corporate domination, to courts promulgating a system of justice appropriate for oligarchy not democracy, that it’s almost embarrassing to have to come into the streets to insist on the basic ideals we thought we all believed in. But it’s the only way. There is the power of wealth, and then there is the power of people. There is the power of the Supreme Court giving unlimited anonymous, free speech to billionaires, and then there is the power of us here today. There is the power of the drone and the ethic of collateral damage, and then there is the power of the recognition of the inestimable value of every life. When the people have the courage to inhabit their own power, they win, always.

Terry Tempest Williams said, The eyes of the future are looking back at us and they are praying for us to see beyond our own time. You in the Occupy Movement are the eyes of the future. You are already looking back from a future we know is the right place to be, the place based in justice and living in harmony with nature. We all learned in biology class about the web of nature, how every species, no matter how big or small, how more or less evolved, is equally and mysteriously important in the health and survival of the entire web. Law is like that, too. It’s impossible to dictate that any powerful institution in a society has only one obligation and that is to make money for its investors. To believe in the rightness of a law like that is to live in the fantasy that acts to do not have consequences, that poison belched into the air only affects poor people, that torture is justified when you do it, and that a child’s primary function is as a profit center for selling food dangerous to her health and as a target for media crippling to her imagination. It’s to live in the fantasy that a corporation, like a giant pathological robot, deserves the same rights as fragile, mortal humans. That’s a fantasy we are here to end. One zebra can’t teach a fat cat that lesson, but hundreds can. One zebra is a martyr, a democracy of zebras can occupy a despoiled land and make it flourish. We are the eyes looking back from the future, we have seen the occupation, and it is good.

Our next step must be to amend the Constitution, to strip corporations of personhood and free speech rights, to make every election a fair, publicly funded election --- no personal or corporate funding, to ensure that every citizen at age 18 is registered automatically to vote, to make election day a holiday, and to return the public airwaves to the public so that all candidates receive equal and free airtime.

That’s good for the first step. The next will be to reintegrate our lives with nature’s laws. That’s the tough one.

Thank you.

Read more...

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

In Maine, East-West Highway feasibility study moves forward

by Chris Buchanan, Defending Water in Maine

LR 2358, An Act To Provide Funding to the Department of Transportation for a Feasibility Study for an East-West Highway, has been given the green light for consideration this session. If you live in Maine, see below for actions you can take with AfD's Defending Water in Maine campaign to help protect your state's ecosystems.

Background
The idea of a Maine East-West highway has been kicked around the Maine Legislature since 1981. However, public and/or private funding has never been provided to study the feasibility of such a highway or to finance its construction.

Canadian businesses want an East-West highway to move goods more cheaply from inland Canada to its eastern provinces and to a proposed Super-Port at Halifax, Nova Scotia, for export. Maine would be used as a throughway. But the highway could also accelerate the exploitation of Maine’s natural resources. Of particular concern to Defending Water in Maine, is the likelihood that the highway would make it economical for giant corporations to profit from cutting down Maine’s forests to supply wood chips to Europe as “green energy” and from exporting Maine’s water in bulk and in bottles to global markets.

Defending Water in Maine and others ask: How will increased truck traffic crossing the state benefit the people of Maine? Simply, it will not. But, it will benefit transnational corporations like Nestlé which can profit from using the highway to exploit and export Maine’s water to sell it around the world.

Why now?
Peter Vigue, CEO of Cianbro, Maine’s largest construction firm, has reignited conversations among business leaders about the East-West highway. The last time Vigue was vocal about the project was in 2007, when he proposed the private toll road from Coburn Gore to Calais. Vigue again is promoting the highway to be built on private land with other business leaders and with state legislators. Cianbro is poised to profit considerably, as the owner of this toll road.

Plans to construct the road are well developed. Cianbro has already identified a route, and contacted major landowners; however, Cianbro has yet to make public the route they are pursuing. See our website for a map of the most likely route.

Key business leaders appear unified, and are organizing influence.

  • Eastern Maine Development Corporation has formed Mobilize Eastern Maine, a new business leader group to promote economic development. They appear to be networking with community college educators. For instance, Washington County Community College (WCCC) is starting a new international commerce business program, stating that they anticipate the East-West highway and increased business at the ports.
  • The Summit to Connect Education and Business in Eastern Maine is hosting an event to reach out to educators on December 8. (Here is information on this event, and the new program at WCCC: WCCC creates new International Commerce Business program)
LR 2358 was just unanimously moved forward for consideration as an emergency bill by the Legislative Council for the upcoming second legislative session. In 2007, Vigue said that, except for river crossings and connecting to the interstate, Cianbro didn’t need to go to the government for permitting, since this would all be privately funded on private land.

However, Senator Doug Thomas just sponsored a bill for a feasibility study. The bill summary states it, “would provide funding for an independent, investment-grade feasibility study to determine the need for and location of an east-west highway in Maine.” Bill sponsor, Senator Doug Thomas, said that, “a surprising amount of work has been done,” that this project is “doable”, and that this would be a boost to the Maine economy. (video of Thomas's testimony is here.)

Action Items
Join our east-west highway watch group. We will maintain a separate list of people who want more information on the development of this threat so we can continue to update you and network without burdening everyone on our listserv.

Identify Landowners. If you or someone you know has been approached about the highway running through their land, let us know! In the near future, we will be organizing to canvass the area as well and will need your help.

Contact your Local Representative and Senators, and the Members of the Transportation Committee re LR 2358. Some talking points:
  • There is no reason for this to be considered as an emergency bill. Even Rep. Thomas admits that this has been under discussion for 20 years. The “emergency” seems to be that Cianbro wants to move ahead.
  • Emergency legislation will not take into account potential environmental impacts of this highway, particularly impacts to Maine’s water and forests.
  • A feasibility study of the East-West highway as a private toll road should not be funded by potential investors. It is unethical to have an investor-funded study of a project that benefits investors. Any study must be unbiased, because we are confident that an East-West highway will not benefit Maine people, or the environment.
  • This bill is being rushed through to serve the interests of Cianbro, a private corporation, and Canadian businesses looking to cut transportation costs, without looking at the public interest of all Mainers. Will the cutting down of our forests, the selling of our water, and being a transport throughway be in the best interest of Maine residents now and in the future?

List of Transportation Committee Members:
Senators:
Douglas Thomas- R (sponsor) 277-3017 firewood@tds.net
Ronald Collins- R 985-2485 SenRonald.Collins@legislature.maine.gov
Bill Diamond- D 892-8941 SenBill.Diamond@legislature.maine.gov

Representatives:
Wayne Parry- R 286-9145 RepWayne.Parry@legislature.maine.gov
Alexander Willette- R 689-8332 alexander.willette@gmail.com
James Gillway- R 548-6372 RepJames.Gillway@legislature.maine.gov
Kimberley Rosen- R 469-3779 Kurlykim40@aol.com
Peter Rioux- R 659-2293 RepPeter.Rioux@legislature.maine.gov
Richard Cebra- R 693-6782 RepRich.Cebra@legislature.maine.gov
Ann Peoples- D 287-1430 RepAnn.Peoples@legislature.maine.gov
Charles Theriault- D 728-4526 RepCharlesK.Theriault@legislature.maine.gov
Edward Mazurek- D 542-0017 RepEd.Mazurek@legislature.maine.gov
George Hogan- D 423-4293 RepGeorge.Hogan@legislature.maine.gov

Please let us know whom you have contacted. Thanks!

Chris Buchanan, chris@defendingwater.net

Read more...

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Blue Hill, Maine, farmer faces suit by state of Maine and Maine Agricultural Commissioner; town and supporters to rally in his support Friday, November 18

On Wednesday, November 9, Dan Brown, owner of Gravelwood Farm in Blue Hill, Maine, was served notice that he is being sued by the State of Maine and Walter Whitcomb, Maine Agricultural Commissioner, for selling food and milk without state licenses.

Blue Hill is one of five Maine towns to have passed the Local Food and Community Self-Governance Ordinance, a local law that permits the types of sales Brown was engaged in.

By filing the lawsuit, the State of Maine and Whitcomb are disregarding the Local Food and Community Self-Governance Ordinance passed nearly unanimously by the citizens of Blue Hill at their town meeting on April 4.

Residents of Blue Hill will be attending the Selectmen’s meeting on Friday, November 18 to enforce the provisions of the ordinance by instructing the town of Blue Hill to send a letter to the Maine Department of Agriculture requesting the lawsuit be withdrawn, and that the state recognize the authority of the Local Food and Community Self-Governance Ordinance.

A rally and press conference will take place Friday at the Blue Hill Town Hall beginning at noon.

You can learn more and support Dan at http://www.facebook.com/WeAreFarmerBrown.

For the media, a conference call with Dan Brown is scheduled for Thursday, November 17, 10am-11am eastern time. Dial it at 866-305-2467, and use access code 260454#. Dan will make a statement and cover the counts listed in the summons. Bob St. Peter, family farmer from Sedgwick, Maine and director of Food for Maine's Future will discuss the campaign calling on the State to withdraw the lawsuit.

Here's Dan, explaining rule changes that led to the suit, and that also underscore the need for us to take local control of our food back from state and federal government regulations that are designed by and for industrial agriculture and agribusiness profiteering.

Read more...

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Defending Water for Life in Maine: tabling at the Common Ground Fair


Defending Water for Life organizers Denise Penttila and Chris Buchanan spent three days in Unity, ME at the Common Ground Fair, September 23rd – 25th, an annual event sponsored by Maine Organic Farmers and Growers Association, which attracts people from all over the state. Chris writes:

Over the course of the weekend, we talked with hundreds of people. We used interactive activities to draw people, including a poster-sized anti-bottled water pledge for folks to sign and drawing on quilt squares to add to our water quilt (pictured at right).

We had the opportunity to talk about taking a rights-based approach to undermine corporate power and to educate many people about how to empower themselves at the local level. Only a few people had ever heard about this method. Folks who approached us with concerns about Nestle in their towns or neighbors’ towns appeared excited and inspired by the end of our talks!

We also learned a great deal about some core issues concerning Maine residents that want to buck the bottle, but feel helpless. In many locations, Mainers have problems with arsenic and radon in their water. This is a rural, well-water issue that we will address more moving forward. It was powerful to hear so many people across Maine share their stories and their passion for water.

Read more...

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Solidarity on the bridges!

Alliance for Democracy Downeast (ME) and Hancock County (ME) Towns in Transition co-sponsored two Occupy Wall Street solidarity rallies last weekend. Organizers write, "there was such an enthusiastic response to the two local democracy rallies last weekend that a group of us intend to do this every weekend. We had 50 attend the rally in Blue Hill and 52 in Ellsworth with very short notice. Our goal is to line both bridges and then extend into town. The weekly rallies are as follows:
  • Blue Hill on the bridge- Every Saturday 12-1 PM
  • Ellsworth on the bridge - Every Sunday 12-1 PM
"If you want to join us,  bring a sign and a smile and we’ll send a message to New York and DC that we are standing in solidarity with them. If you don't have a sign, come anyway. It's a fun way to connect with like minded individuals who believe we need to reclaim America.

"Tips for new sign makers and rally attenders: Make signs with big dark letters and not too many words--individuals are reading them while driving. Point the signs toward the drivers. Smile and wave to them."

Ellsworth and Blue Hill are just two of the 1,300 occupations that have formed across the US in the last three weeks. Some are actual encampments, some are regular solidarity rallies. If there's not one near you, hit the streets! Downloadable posters, fliers, etc. are here, suggestions for street theater here!

You can see some pictures from Blue Hill on our Facebook page. AfD'ers are involved with occupations in Portland, Davis, Wall Street, Washington and Boston as well.

Read more...

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Mother Earth Water Walk, from Maine to Wisconsin

by Chris Buchanan, AfD's Defending Water in Maine campaign

Native peoples representing the five tribes of the Wabanaki Nation of Maine and Canada gathered on May 7 at a sacred site in Machiasport to begin the Eastern Directions ceremonial walk to Bad River, Wisconsin, where they converged on June 12 with walkers from the North, South and West for a great ceremony. The mission was to raise awareness of the sacred and critical role of healthy water to all life.

As an organizer with Defending Water for Life in Maine covering this region, I supported the walkers by spreading information, organizing overnight stays in Ellsworth, Etna, Athens, and Stratton, being the primary contact for Maine walkers and supporters, coordinating safety of the walkers with local police, providing guidance on the route, and by participating in the ceremony as a walker.

The Water Walk has been one of the most powerful experiences I have had. There is something incredible about focusing all of your energy and intention on praying to water, healing water, and acknowledging the critical presence of water in everything… It was an amazing opportunity.

Grandmother Irene handing over the water to Grandmother
Josephine. In Maine, the walkers covered some 60 miles
a day, starting at 3:30 a.m. and ending around 7 p.m.

The mission of the Anishinawbe Grandmothers that started this walk in 2003 is so aligned with the mission of our project, Defending Water for Life in Maine. We want people to be aware of water in everything. We want people and ecosystems to have the right to healthy water in their communities. Never should water be mined and sold for profit by a private corporation like Nestle. Being driven by dollars, they will never have the best interests of the community, the people, or nature in mind.

Before the Walk started this year, one of the lead walkers said, “We are doing this walk on our own beliefs within our own aboriginal culture and values of the importance of our waters. [Water] is very precious and sacred to our being, as it is one of the basic elements needed for all life to exist.” The walk is, “a prayer for the water, for Mother Earth, for the animals, the birds, the insects, the trees and for us, all two leggeds. Together the walks were one prayer for life.”

For more information on the Mother Earth Water Walk, please visit the website, www.motherearthwaterwalk.com. I would also be happy to share my experiences with anyone who is interested in chatting!

You can read more at the Defending Water in Maine website, here.

Read more...

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Trenton, ME, passes local food and self-governance ordinance

The fifth Maine town to vote on the Local Food and Community Self-Governance Ordinance, Trenton, passed it at their town meeting Saturday morning. The vote was close, at 29-25 (Trenton has only about 1000 year-round residents, and there was a fire alarm early in the meeting which cleared the hall and thinned the crowd a little).

AfD vice co-chair Bonnie Preston, who has been working to help spread the word about these ordinances, writes that pro-ordinance people plan to do some follow-up with the town and select board to try to make sure they better understand this issue. They learned a lot from this town meeting about how important the ground-work is, and how important it is to understand the circumstances in each town, something that can really only be done by that community.

They are still anticipating a re-vote in Brooksville this summer; this was the one town where the ordinance was defeated, although a town board may have improperly recommended that it not be passed. Right now Local Food and Community Self-Governance ordinances are 4-1; they will work to make it 5-0.

Read more...

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Maine is what “food democracy” looks like

Food democracy is more than “voting with your fork” by spending your food budget with your ethics in mind. “Voting” this way means the more money you have to spend on food the more votes you have. Real food democracy is based on the right of all people to make decisions together about how food is grown, produced and distributed, removing food from corporate control.

In Maine, more towns are set to vote on local food & self governance ordinances similar to those passed by three other Maine towns earlier this year. Local AfD members were active in the campaign to pass these ordinances, especially in the town of Blue Hill.

Trenton will be voting this Saturday. Monroe, which previously passed an anti-corporate personhood ordinance, will be voting June 13. Gray is working on their ordinance for a town meeting later this year.

This is food democracy because it changes the “rules” about food production. These local food ordinances allow local producers to sell home-made or farm produced food, including meat, baked goods, or preserved items without meeting federal inspection or facility requirements. These federal standards are designed for industrial-scale food production, and require an investment that very few small farms can afford. For instance, two Penobscot farmers found that in order to legally slaughter $1,000 worth of chicken on their farm they needed to spend almost $40,000 to build a slaughterhouse, an economic cost that has contributed to the very few alternatives to the highly corporatized and vertically consolidated US food system. (Recently, however, as the demand for local, organic meat and poultry has increased, small-scale and, often mobile, slaughter houses have emerged in NY, VT, and CA in particular.)

Local food and self governance ordinances emphasize the importance of small farm production to the local economy, and make clear that on the local, person-to-person level, individuals can ensure their own food safety. People who know their producers will buy from the ones they trust, and producers, knowing their sales depend on their reputation, will keep their standards for quality and safety high.

State authority vs. local food democracy
Maine is a state with strong municipal home rule, so town-level ordinances have not yet been challenged at the state level, although the towns that have passed this ordinance have received warning letters from the Food and Rural Resources Section of the state Department of Agriculture, saying that the local ordinances are pre-empted by state law: Blue Hill's letter is here. This is of some concern, as two state bills that would have bolstered the local ordinances at the state level were voted down by the Maine House of Representatives on the recommendation of the state's Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Committee.

The term “food democracy” was developed by Tim Lang in the mid-1990s based on the principle that citizens or “food citizens” have the power to determine food policies and practices locally, regionally, nationally and globally. Food democracy asserts it is a right and responsibility of citizens to participate in decisions concerning their food system.

Food democracy is a framework for making our food system more responsive to the needs of its citizens and decentralizing control that challenges the corporate structure and allow for bottom-up control of the food system. This process transforms individuals from “passive consumers into active, educated citizens”. The goal of food democracy is to ensure all citizens have access to affordable, healthy and culturally appropriate foods. Food democracy emphasizes social justice in the food system, and food is viewed as the center of the democratic process. (Adapted from Food First. And check out Tim Lang, Food Security or Food Democracy.

Read more...