Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Solidarity Economy Means Cultural, Environmental and Political Transformation




by Jim Tarbell

In 2007, at the Atlanta US Social Forum I witnessed the formation of the US Solidarity Economy Network. (USSEN). This past week, I used my time at the Detroit Social Forum to investigate how the Network was progressing. When I mentioned this to my colleagues, they nodded approvingly, but then stared at me quizzically asking, “What is the solidarity economy.”

That question is being answered as more people become involved with identifying and defining this organic, transformative phenomenon. Nancy Neamtan of the Quebec Chantier de L’Economie Sociale points out that “for years everyone was defining themselves as a community radio or a fair trade association or a workers co-op or a housing co-op and there was no common umbrella for defining ourselves as part of the economy. So the leap we made in 1996 was to come together as a broad network of co-ops, non-profits, and social movements in urban and rural areas that shared a vision of a solidarity economy that is democratic, inclusive and equitable.” She goes on to say that the solidarity economy is “citizen-based action within the economy through cooperative, collective or non-profit organizations that are producing goods and services based on a logic that sees the primacy of people over capital, that are democratically controlled, that respond to the needs of the community and that promote a philosophy of empowerment.”

Among the many workshops on the solidarity economy at the USSF, the Center for Community-Based Enterprise (C2BE) hosted one called Building Local Community and Creating Jobs through Cooperation. It featured several businesses across the country and included a Detroit neighborhood of community-based enterprises that hosted lunch the next day for a tour of Detroit community-based enterprises.

The US Solidarity Network (www.USSEN.org) helped organize a whole track of workshops at the Detroit Social Forum including one on how to map and organize solidarity economy members locally. Meanwhile, the Intercontinental Solidarity Economy Network (RIPESS) offered reports from solidarity networks across the planet. Representatives from Quebec, Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America reported back on laws, forums and networks that are being developed around the world to support and strengthen the solidarity economy.

At the Friday night plenary, Daniel Tygel, Executive Secretary of the Brazilian Forum on the Solidarity Economy captured the imagination of the entire Social Forum saying, “We must be able to deal with our differences, and we must be able to find what we have in common to get over the individual or organizational perspective, so that we can get to a massive perspective to propose transformation. . . We are always thinking about the transformation of the economy and the transformation of society. The main project of the solidarity economy is to combine economy, culture, the environment and politics. What we are fighting for is a kind of termite method of killing capitalism. The termites are eating the wood, but if you look at the house, it looks like it is there, but the termites are eating the wood and one day this house will fall down.”

The next issue of Justice Rising will highlight the solidarity economy and how we can all participate in the coming transformation. Let me know if you want to participate in this issue or have ideas about its content. We are all in this together and it will take a massive effort to come together and create a truly transformative solidarity economy.

Read more...

The choice? Amendment or corporate rule!

While the mainstream media didn't pay a heck of a lot of attention to the US Social Forum, alternative media were there, writing, audio and videotaping. Kevin Gosztola of OpEd news did this interview with David Cobb, speaking on behalf of Move to Amend and the need to strip corporations of their illegitimate claims to be "persons" with constitutional rights continues to grow.

Did you sign the organizing petition? Did you forward it to family and friends? The corporate media is not going to cover us until we are so large and loud that they can't ignore us, so please help us make that happen.

Read more...

Bagdad to Flint: Chris Hedges talks to Michael Moore on corporations, imperialism, illusion and collapse

Grim but good. Chris Hedges and Michael Moore discuss "the avalanche that's come down the mountain." Thanks to friends at Concord (MA) Climate Action Network for forwarding.



Read more...

David Cobb tours Ohio: Bring friends, family and colleagues to learn more about Move To Amend

Start Independence Day out right by coming to hear David Cobb discuss the growing national movement to amend the US Constitution to abolish corporate personhood and create real democracy.

David will be speaking Wednesday, June 30 in Athens; Thursday, July 1 in Wooster; Friday, July 2 in Cleveland; and Saturday, July 3 in Akron. See venue info and times below.

David is an executive committee member of the Move to Amend coalition, composed of more than 60 grassroots and national organizations working toward a 28th Amendment to declare that corporations are not people, and that money is not equivalent to free speech. (Alliance for Democracy is a steering committee member of Move to Amend.) He's also a principal of POCLAD (Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy) and was the Green Party's presidential candidate in 2004.

Wednesday, June 30: Athens
7:00 p.m., Talk, Christ-the-King Church, 75 Stewart St.
Contacts: John Howell, 740-592-5789, howell@frognet.net; Dick Hogan, 740-664-4028,greenfirecenter@gmail.com

Thursday, July 1: Wooster
7:00 p.m., Talk, Unitarian Universalist Fellowship, 3186 Burbank Rd.
Contact: Dave Sears, 330-262-WNET (9638), RenDave@raex.com

Friday July 2: Cleveland
7:00 p.m., Talk, Unitarian Universalist Society, 2728 Lancashire Rd., Cleveland Heights
Contacts: Lois Romanoff, 216-231-2170, loisromanoff@gmail.com; Greg Coleridge, 330-928-2301gcoleridge@afsc.org

Saturday July 3: Akron
10:00 AM, Talk, Maple Valley Branch Public Library, 1187 Copley Rd., Akron
Contact: Mary Nichols-Rhodes, 330-957-6167, pdaohio@gmail.com; Greg Coleridge, 330-928-2301,gcoleridge@afsc.org

For more information, see the Northeast Ohio American Friends Service Committee page on"Corporations vs Democracy", the "Create Real Democracy" blog, and the Move to Amend website.

Read more...

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

A little media on the Social Forum

by Barbara Clancy

Here's some good questions asked and answered about the seemingly "controlled chaos" of the US Social Forum, by Mark Engler in this article in Yes! Hat tip to Erin Polgreen of The Media Consortium.

Engler writes:

Whenever the social forum speaks of itself as the future of the U.S. Left, vexing issues arise: Can any coherent political program emerge from an amorphous, multi-issue assembly? Can we formulate a vision of the Left without more serious participation from key progressive constituencies such as organized labor? Can the collection of radicals and community-based organizations that are present here become a political force with mainstream reach, or are they too self-marginalizing? The answers are not easy to come by, and non-starry-eyed attendees can easily grow wary in contemplating such imposing matters.

Where the social forum thrives, in contrast, is in smaller moments, free of grand pretense. Walking the halls and seeing a seemingly endless stream of organizers, urban gardeners, filmmakers, human rights workers, energetic students, and community activists can be subtly uplifting. Occasionally, the conversations generated within this collection of people can be transcendent.

But the "only connect" the Forum offers is not just a matter of inspiration, but action. Engler points out the 2007 forum saw the founding of the Domestic Workers Alliance, which recently passed a Domestic Workers Bill of Rights in New York State and is at work to expand this victory nationwide. Concrete action and solid organizing--most of it by people overlooked by both the media and the big non-profit organizations--came out of Atlanta, and will assuredly come out of Detroit, too. The synergy between food security and urban agriculture groups at a Saturday presentation, for instance, shows that Detroit community activists are very aware of how their work is part of the widest movements against racism and for popular democracy and human rights, and are not shy about holding more mainstream allies accountable for their own relationships with class, race, and corporate domination.

As Engler says, "at the US Social Forum, as in everyday political life, you can find plenty of things to feel cynical about. But you can also find people in whose presence it is a privilege to be. Those who leave motivated by that all-too-uncommon experience will rarely regret the effort taken to find it." The forum was a great place for democracy and governance activists to be--a big thank you to our members who helped get us and our message there this year!

Read more...

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Meanwhile, in Moab...

Laird and Robin Monahan crossed into Utah early this week, taking a break from foot travel to drive 170 miles along I-70 (walking isn't allowed on the interstate). On Thursday they were at the Grand County Public Library in Moab for a "Meet the Monahans" event, and were interviewed by local media: the Richfield Reaper, community radio KZMU, and the Moab Times--you can read the Times story here.

Meanwhile, in Detroit, Move to Amend groups have been highlighting the walk and encouraging people to follow the brothers' progress online. People on the route of the walk can support them by connecting them with local media and with groups that might host speaking events, and those who are further away can leave a "thank you" comment on their blog, Lairdandrobin.org.

If you're on the east coast, keep an eye on their blog for their arrival date in DC, and join them for a rally and a day of lobbying--watch this blog, the Move to Amend site, and the AfD enews for more details (subscribe to the AfD e-news here).

Read more...

Rebellion, Revolution and the Future of Detroit




By Jim Tarbell

Detroit’s strong proud and resilient black political movement has played a huge part in the US Social Forum (USSF). Wednesday’s plenary featured a review of the 1967 Rebellion with Detroit Black Panther co-founder Ron Scott and UAW activist General Baker. General Baker declared the “1967 rebellion a defining moment in Detroit’s history . . . That taught us that the only value of the black man to white society was at the point of production and that’s why we started organizing in the factories.” Ron Scott added that they became revolutionaries in the 1960s when they realized . “ that we did not have control over our lives . . . as a result the Black Panther Party was primarily attacked because we were talking about building an independent community response to the oppression that existed.”

To get a real experience of these lives, the USSF offered daily tours that included Detroit Social History, Cultural Immersion, Environmental Justice and a look at Detroit’s abolitionist and underground railroad history. For those who want to engage directly there are daily actions: to stop electrical shutoffs; an anniversary march of Martin Luther King’s I have a Dream speech; a solidarity rally for aggrieved restaurant workers and an action for “Clean Air Good Jobs and Justice for All” at the Detroit Incinerator.

On the final day, there almost thirty forums discussed Detroit and the Rust belt. The League of Revolutionary Black Workers hosted one on the History of Labor in Detroit. Besides General Baker, it included testimonials from a historic gathering of men and women that participated in all aspects of the Detroit labor and social movements of the past sixty years. Former US Congressman John Lewis was there as well as Detroit legend Waistline, author of Detroit: A History of Sruggle, A Vision of the Future. They outlined their successful struggle for economic security and then reflected how the times had changed, that we are all now part of the disposessd class; that we are not needed in the labor force. They declared that now is the time to confront this new future and take back our lives and government from corporate domination.

Read more...

Tabling, talking, listening, connecting...

by Barbara Clancy

One of our main occupations at the US Social Forum is staffing the Move to Amend table, along with partners Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County, Liberty Tree, and Progressive Democrats of America. There's been a tremendous amount of activity around the table, hundreds of signatures gathered on the Move To Amend call to action, and wide interest in a constitutional amendment against corporate personhood, both among long-time activists and people new to the fact that corporations, thanks to the courts and the ruling class, have grabbed the same rights that social movements fought for--and are still fighting for.

Outreach to people for whom this is a new idea gives us an opportunity to sharpen our "rap," but it also lets us hear people's stories--the thousand reasons why cutting corporate power off at the root is so necessary. These connections also sharpen our sense of where our work fits in terms of all the movements toward social, economic, and environmental justice here at the Forum. Listening to people is just as much of a skill as talking to (hopefully not "at") them.

There have also been a few backers of constitutional rights for corporations--mainly people who are concerned about hobbling the economy or not sure of the division between freedom of speech and freedom of the press--which nowadays is by and large a corporate conglomeration, in which the mainstream news we read and watch is brought to us by entities with interests in arms manufacturing and extractive industries. At some point we "agree to disagree" and move on, and with luck their arguments will be the basis of FAQ's for those who are coming to the issue of corporate rule fresh from the "other side" or from no side at all.

We've passed on a stack of Justice Risings, with the help of council members Nancy Price, Rick Staggenborg and Bonnie Preston, and Justice Rising editor Jim Tarbell.

More coming on workshops, connections made, and the PMAs we participated in--off to the table...

Read more...

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Leading a Wave of Change


















By Jim Tarbell

Twenty-five thousand people have descended on Detroit for the second US Social Forum. If 1967 was a rebellion here; this is an uprising. It is an explosion of spirit and connection; an understanding that systemic change is necessary and that people are coming together to make it happen. Dominated by a youthful sea of multi-racial faces, this five-day event features over a thousand workshops promoting the promise that another world is possible. Forums and People’s Movement Assemblies are following fourteen different tracks including: Capitalism In Crisis; Climate Justice; Strategies For Building Power and Ensuring Community Needs; Indigenous Sovereignty; and International Solidarity.

The Social Forum grew as a counterpoint to the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland where the political and financial elite convene to devise a global future based on markets and resource depletion rather than people and sustainability. For the past decade Social Forums have been held across the planet building a vibrant vision of a healthy and empowerment.

With the US as a leader of the global corporate empire that is depleting resources, poisoning the planet and destroying our rights to a stable climate and functioning economy, people in this country have come to realize that change must begin at home This second US Social forum, with twice the participation of the 2007 Social Forum in Atlanta, is concentrating on that idea.
The Alliance for Democracy is deeply involved, leading workshops on the right to water and our community commons. As a founder of the Campaign to Legalize Democracy, AfD is working the crowd to end corporate personhood and empower local communities to protect their culture and resources. Another world is possible and this grand gathering is leading the way.

Read more...

Monday, June 21, 2010

Health Care for California: Call today to support SB 810, the California Health Security Act, and come to Sacramento on June 29 for the hearing!

Thanks to tireless advocacy by people from across the state, SB 810, the California Health Security Act, will have a hearing on June 29 at 1:30 p.m. in the Assembly Health Committee Room 4202, at the Capitol.

Passage of the bill by Assembly Health is a first step through committees, to the Assembly Floor, and then to the Governor. Let's keep up the fight for health care legislation that will provide universal coverage, broaden benefits, and control costs. SB 810 eliminates health insurance companies in California and sets up a state-run California Healthcare System funded by the money currently going into the private system from federal and state budgets, employers, and tax-payers. SB 810 targets spending to where it's needed: doctors, clinics and other providers, and not to excess overhead and administrative costs. Need to learn more? Click here. And support SB 810 with one or both of these actions:

Call your Assembly member and say you want a Yes vote on SB 810. Voter pressure got the bill this far--let's keep it up until it's law! Please call, fax, write, or email your assembly member, especially if you can't attend the hearing. Get their contact information at www.leginfo.ca.gov.

Attend the hearing. A big turnout is crucial to show the Assembly Health Committee and state government that SB 810 has the people's support. Buses and carpools are leaving from San Francisco, East Bay, Central Valley and Placer County--click here to connect with organizers.

Remember, one in five Californians have no health insurance at all. Fewer employers are providing coverage. Insurance premiums are rising four times as fast as wages. And even with the passage of the national health care bill, millions of Americans will still be uninsured, underinsured, or paying far too much of their incomes for coverage. SB 810 gives California an opportunity to show the country what real health insurance reform looks like. Call to support the bill, and join with others in Sacramento on June 29. Thank you!

Read more...

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Declaration of Health Independence and Security

Healthcare advocates from fourteen states met in Wayne, Penn., April 10, 2010. The following Declaration is a result of the meeting. Add your name to the Declaration at Healthcare-Now!'s website.

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for the people of this nation and its separate but equal states to transform conditions related to the common good within our control and necessary in order to assure the basic human rights of all, recognition of our common humanity and a decent respect to the opinions of humankind compel us to declare those conditions for which we demand such a transformation.

Healthcare is a basic human right. To this end, we the undersigned representatives of these assembled states, declare our dedication to the transformation of the profit-driven healthcare system into one of our shared humanity under a social insurance model–a publicly funded, privately and publicly delivered system, equally available to all. Current expenditures on healthcare can and must fund this systemic transformation.

Working in our individual and several states, we will educate our fellow residents, petition our legislators for our collective redress of grievances under the current system, and pursue passage of patient-driven healthcare policy legislation.

We hold these truths still to be self-evident, that all people are created equal and have certain inalienable rights. Among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that in order to enjoy these rights, access to healthcare without regard to financial or any other barriers must be secured.

Signed this 10th day of April, 2010, at Central Baptist Church in Wayne, Pennsylvania.

States represented: West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, California, New York, Colorado, Wisconsin, and Minnesota

Read more...

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Central Maine town approves anti-corporate personhood ordinance

A central Maine town has followed in the footsteps of neighbors in Shapleigh and Newfield, and voted to approve a new ordinance that denies the rights of persons to corporations. Town meeting voters in Monroe passed the ordinance on June 14.

Other towns have passed--or tried to pass--similar ordinances in response to concerns that corporate water extraction threatened community wellbeing. AfD's Defending Water for Life has provided organizational support to several of these campaigns. And while no corporation currently has its eyes on Monroe's water, resident Seth Yentes said it was good to be proactive. The ordinance is "giving us a foundation to jump off of if somebody wanted to come in and extract water from our town... It's really about local control and democracy and I think it's a great idea."

The "Town of Monroe Local Self-Government Ordinance," as the new law is called, flies in the face of years of court opinions that have bestowed various constitutional rights on the corporate form. The Maine Municipal Association cited these precedents when solicited by town officials, and determined that that the ordinance overstepped the bounds of local governance. The legal issues with the ordinance would "create serious doubt as to its validity and enforceability if approved by the voters," according to the MMA.

Some voters questioned whether the ordinance would discourage or put too many restrictions on business, or would cost the town if it came to the point that Monroe had to defend the law in court. Defenders of the ordinance emphasized that it does not restrict any legitimate business from coming to Monroe. They also stressed that if the new law was challenged in court, costs of defending it would be far less than its detractors feared

You can read local coverage here.

Read more...

Granny D to be feted this saturday at Clearwater Festival

This Saturday, June 19, starting at 3:20 p.m., a forty minute "shout out" will honor Doris "Granny D" Haddock. Folksoul Band (her own "Tattoo") will be the principle performers, hopefully joined by Pete Seeger, a long-time close friend. A tribute will be read by Dan Weeks, President of ACR (Americans for Campaign Reform); Doris spoke there in 2006.

The Clearwater Festival 2010--The Great Hudson River Revival, a music and environmental summer festival is now in its 41st year, and has become the nation's oldest and largest annual festival of its kind. It was first inspired by Pete Seeger and friends, who built the sloop "The Clearwater" and began raising funds and awareness to restore the Hudson River. Sustainability and social responsibility are among its goals.

The festival runs from 10 AM until dusk on Saturday and Sunday, June 19th and 20th. It is sited on the grounds of Croton Point Park, along the river's edge at Croton-on-Hudson, NY. More info at www.clearwater.org/festival.

Read more...

Monday, June 14, 2010

Move to Amend profiled on WBAI's "Ecologic" as part of BP/Deepwater disaster coverage

Update: Download or listen to the archived show here--scroll down, and it's at the top of the list.

Riki Ott will be on Pacifica Radio tomorrow (Tuesday) from 11 a.m. to 12 noon, on "Ecologic," hosted by David Occhiuto. The discussion will start off with geologist Chris Landau, then move to Riki and a discussion of the BP oil disaster and Move To Amend. Journalist Heather Rogers will also be on the show. You can listen in on WBAI's website, and find out more details on the broadcast here.

Read more...

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Time for a corporate death penalty

Bruce Dixon writes, "There are more than 40 federal offenses for which the death penalty can be applied to human beings, most of them connected to homicide of one kind or another. But countless homicides committed by the artificial persons we call corporations go unpunished every day. Apparently “personal responsibility” applies only to humans who are not operating behind the legal shield of corporate personhood."

by Bruce A. Dixon. Posted June 9 on Black Agenda Report

Over the last hundred or so years, corporations have gained many of the rights previously accorded only to human beings.  Corporations have the right to buy and sell anything or anyone that can be bought or sold.  Corporations have claimed the right to lie in their advertising and PR as "free speech,"  along with the right to help us mere humans choose our judges and elected officials with unlimited amounts of cash, including anonymous cash.  Corporations have been awarded the right to patent genetic sequences of diseases and to monopolize their cures, as well as patent rights to living plants and animals not of their invention.  A whole type of new anti-pollution regulation called "cap and trade" actually enshrines a corporate right to pollute and establishes exchanges upon which speculators can bid, trade and capture rents for those alleged rights.  And unlike a working person, who has no right to next month's let alone next year's wages, legal scholars working for corporations have devised and popularized something they call the "regulatory takings" doctrine, under which corporations may claim and recover from the government rights to profits they might have made in years to come.  And let's not even talk about trillions in corporate welfare for banks, military contractors, Wal-Mart and others.

While many argue that corporations have too many rights as it is, this might be a good time to extend them at least one more right we humans have kept for ourselves until now; the right to be put to death for serious crimes.  Right now federal statutes alone offer individuals more than 40 different ways to earn the death penalty, including kidnapping, treason, aircraft hijacking, espionage and many varieties of murder, conspiracy, threatening murder and some drug crimes.  Individual states offer the death penalty for a host of similar offenses.

Putting bad corporate actors down the way we do rabid dogs and serial killers is not a new or even a radical idea.  Corporations are created by the charters of individual states, so states DO have the power to revoke them.  Early in this country's history, corporate charters used to limit a company's existence to a set number of years, to confine their operations to manufacturing a certain item, building a specific road or canal and prohibit them from changing ownership, dumping or concealing their assets or engaging in other kinds of business.  These are legal powers that our governments have not used in a long, long time, but which it's high time to reclaim.

Homicidal profit-seeking on the part of corporations has become an everyday fact of modern life.  Whether it's employers cutting health and safety corners, marketers pushing unsafe drugs, food and products of all kinds, or the deadly industrial fouling of the planet's air, soil, oceans and climate we are living in the midst of a corporate crime wave of murderous and epic proportions.  If we value human life, it only makes sense to treat corporate serial killers like, well, corporate serial killers, to confiscate their ill-gotten assets, to revoke their corporate charters and sentence the artificial personae of corporate malefactors to death.  If corporations are legal persons, it's time to enforce some personal responsibility upon them with a corporate death penalty.

After we accomplish that, it will be time to think about extending a little of that personal responsibility to the actual humans who operate behind the legal shield of the corporations.  But right now, as the saying goes, a corporation can't even get arrested in this country, which, come to think of it is still another right we humans ought to bestow upon them.

Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor of Black Agenda Report. This article is also available as a podcast on the BAR website; follow the link in the heading.

Read more...

Gulf shrimper arrested for pouring oil on herself in Senate energy hearing, protesting Sen. Murkowski's refusal to make BP pay

(from the press release by action organizers Code Pink)
Diane Wilson, a fourth generation shrimper from the Gulf, poured oil on herself at todays Senate Energy Committee hearing to protest Senator Lisa Murkowski's refusal to make BP pay for the disaster that has devastating Wilson's shrimping community. Republican Lisa Murkowski, ranking member of the Senate Energy Committee, blocked the bill that would have lifted the oil companies' liability cap (the Big Oil Bailout Prevention Act). Wilson was removed from the hearing and arrested.

Wilson traveled from Texas, where her livelihood and those of her fellow shrimpers has been ruined. She had this to say:

My name is Diane Wilson. I am a fourth generation shrimper from the Gulf. With this BP disaster, I am seeing the destruction of my community and I am outraged. I am also seeing elected representatives like Senator Lisa Murkowski blocking BP from being legally responsible to pay for this catastrophe. She stopped the Big Oil Bailout Prevention Act and wants to keep the liability cap at a pitiful $75 million. This is outrageous. How dare she side with big oil over the American people who have been so devastated by this manmade disaster.

"We want people to call Senator Murkowskis office and tell her to stop supporting big oil and support a healthy environment and American livelihoods instead," said CODEPINK co-founder Medea Benjamin, who was with Wilson at the hearing. "Our members from across the country have sent Murkowski thousands of emails already. We also want the Senator to call for Diane Wilson to be exonerated. BP CEO Tony Hayward should be in jail, not a distraught shrimper!"

Wilson has been working for decades fighting the polluting of the Gulf. She wrote the book An Unreasonable Woman: A True Story of Shrimpers, Politicos, Polluters, and the Fight for Seadrift, Texas detailing her years long fight against oil and chemical companies in her community. She went on to say, "I have seen the oil and chemical companies destroying our air, water, our wildlife--and the government going along with it. Politicians like Murkowski take campaign money from big oil and then get in bed with the same oil and chemical corporations. This must stop. Enough is enough."

Wilson is also a co-founder of the organization CODEPINK Women for Peace. She was in front of BP HQ in Houston, Texas two weeks ago to protest the oilspill and draw attention to BPs legacy of negligence. Read her most recent article, "The BP oil gusher is just the latest in a long line of assaults on the Gulf of Mexico," published on Grist.org.

For more info contact Medea Benjamin/CODEPINK at medea@globalexchange.org or call 415-235-6517.

Read more...

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Action on Water and Climate: Friday June 11 deadline!

We ask for your quick action to sign on to this petition to tell climate negotiators - “Protect Water, Protect the Climate.” The petition will be sent in on Friday, June 11, so please read more and sign the petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/Water-and-Climate-Justice-Bonn

Background: Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are meeting in Bonn, Germany from May 31- June 11 to prepare for the next major climate talks in Cancun, Mexico from Nov. 29 – Dec. 10. The Cancun meeting is the sequel to the failed climate talks in Copenhagen this past December, and already the People’s Climate Justice Movement is organizing to have a large presence and impact.

Unfortunately, protecting fresh water sources is not part of the discussion. The online petition sponsored by the Climate Justice Network, of which the Alliance is a part, seeks to change that, by emphasizing the link between stewardship of water and prevention of climate change.

The petition also asks for a more open negotiating process, and endorses recommendations for action that came out of the recent World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth. These should not be ignored in preference to the Copenhagen Accord. Read here why the Peoples Conference model of inclusion offers only path forward on climate change.

Read more...

Action on Campaign Finance: Call Congress for the DISCLOSE Act

As you probably know, AfD is working as part of the Move to Amend coalition to build support for a 28th Amendment banning corporate personhood and stripping corporations of constitutional rights, including First Amendment political “free” speech rights.

Now that corporate CEOS can give all they want in election campaigns, they and their lobbyists are gearing up to make certain the corporate person is hidden behind the curtain--so we don’t know who is trying to influence whom and for what.

What can you do? Today, we’re asking you to make a call on behalf of the DISCLOSE Act—legislation introduced by Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), which would require major special-interest donors to identify themselves on the campaign ads they produce to support—or attack—candidates.

In the House, the DISCLOSE Act has 114 co-sponsors—you can check to see if your member of Congress is one here. If he or she isn't on the list, call and demand that they sign on. On the Senate side, cosponsors are here.

Background: Special interest money has long warped politics and policy development, but the kind of electioneering the DISCLOSE act takes aim at is new, thanks to the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United. Corporations and unions now have the right to fund campaigns for candidates, independent of the candidates' own election committees. What this means is not, as the Court claims, enhanced freedom of speech, but simply more corporate money corrupting our political system.

The DISCLOSE Act is far from the perfect fix. It doesn't attack the root of the problem: the fact that years of corporate-friendly court decisions have conflated free speech with the ability to buy the biggest megaphone.

But even this legislative bandage is under attack, as the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Rifle Association, and other special interest groups pressure Congress to water down this commonsense initiative with amendments that could make it nothing more than lipstick on the corporate cash cow. Make a call today to tell Congress to stand firm!

Read more...

Action Alert: Get investor rights clauses out of US trade pacts

We urge you to ask President Obama to stand by his campaign pledge to remove investor rights clauses from U.S. trade pacts--negotiations for a new one, the Transpacific Partnership, will get underway in San Francisco later this month. Please visit Public Citizen's site for background and to sign on to the call.

Background:
In 2008, the government of El Salvador lawfully denied mining permits to Pacific Rim Mining Company for a massive gold mine in a rural watershed area 40 miles south of San Salvador. To process the expected haul of gold and silver, mining operations would have used an estimated 22 million liters of water and 950 tons of cyanide, and the threat to water resources, agriculture and health spurred resistance to the plan across the nation. Even Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes has said, "It's very simple: my government will not authorize any extractive mining project."

But now Pacific Rim has gone to the World Bank, and in a closed-door hearing that started last week, the corporation will claim some $77 million in damages against El Salvador based on the controversial CAFTA investor rights rules. Under these rules, a private company can sue governments based on loss of future expected profits. It's the first time the investor rights clause has been used in an environmental protection case, but it won't be the last as multinational extractive industries go after a growing movement in the Global South for environmental justice, sustainability and rights of nature.

Read more...

Bad day for campaign finance reform

Earlier this month, we wrote about a Ninth District Court of Appeals decision overturning a lower court's ban on extra public funding for Arizona gubernatorial candidates who are facing the free-spending GOP firing range owner Buz Mills, a Republican, who has plowed $2.3 million into the race as of the end of May.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/06/08/20100608supreme-court-blocks-arizona-candidates-matching-funds.html#ixzz0qNVUFRewcandidates. The Ninth's call was to follow Arizona's original plan and give the three clean elections candidates extra funding. But yesterday, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked Arizona from providing the extra cash, effectively reducing the candidate's clean election funding by two-thirds. The court didn't note any dissent, or explain its reasoning—it needn't until Fall, by which time the election will likely be decided.

You can read more about the decision at SCOTUS blog and the Arizona Republic. We more or less agree with the New York Times, which sees the Roberts court as committed to the "destruction of the laws and systems set up in recent decades to reduce the influence of big money in politics."

Meanwhile, in California, Proposition 15 lost 42.5 percent to 57.5 percent. The measure would have set up a pilot public funding program for secretary of state elections, financed through additional fees on lobbyists. Post mortems center on whether it was a good idea to float such a ballot question in an election where all the major races were on the GOP side, or whether the people of California distrust public financing because they can't stomach paying to elect jerks.

Read more...

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Sunday reader's roundup

Good commentary you may have missed--think of this post as a supplement to the Sunday papers, which have shrunk down over the past few years to the point that you have to think about whether you'll line the birdcage or wrap the fish...

Dana Milbank in the Washington Post on the theological ramifications of calling the BP spill an "act of God:"

This interpretation is at the very cutting edge of ecclesiastical thought. In the past, our Heavenly Father has involved himself in floods, droughts and the occasional earthquake, but this may be his first foray into industrial disasters.

The Valdez spill was an act of Exxon. Bhopal was an act of Union Carbide. But the BP spill is an act of God. Oiliness is next to godliness.

Forgive this blasphemy, but is it perhaps time to question the Doctrine of Boardroom Infallibility? In Washington, belief in corporate divinity has become a bipartisan religion, and it's polytheistic...
On Truthout, Jim Hightower corrects misuse of the word "spill":
Many news reports about the Gulf oil catastrophe refer to it as a "spill." Wrong. A spill is a minor "oops" -- one accidentally spills milks, for example, and from childhood, we're taught the old aphorism: "Don't cry over spilt milk." What's in the Gulf isn't milk and it wasn't spilt. The explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon well was the inevitable result of deliberate decisions made by avaricious corporate executives, laissez faire politicians and obsequious regulators.
Chris Hedges says what this country needs is a few good Communists:
We have to grasp, as Marx did, that corporations are not concerned with the common good. They exploit, pollute, impoverish, repress, kill and lie to make money. They throw poor families out of homes, let the uninsured die, wage useless wars to make profits, poison and pollute the ecosystem, slash social assistance programs, gut public education, trash the global economy, loot the U.S. Treasury and crush all popular movements that seek justice for working men and women. They worship only money and power. And, as Marx knew, unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force that consumes greater and greater numbers of human lives until it finally consumes itself. The nightmare in the Gulf of Mexico is the perfect metaphor for the corporate state.

Read more...

Get key recommendations from the Bolivian Summit into the UN's negotiating text on climate change

Maggie Zhou, of Mass. Coalition for Healthy Communities, sends the following request:
Below is a link to an online action launched by Friends of the Earth that we urgently need  people to take as part of the pressure we are exerting on the Chair of the Ad hoc Working Group on Longterm Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) (at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations) in Bonn so that the key recommendations of the Bolivian Summit (World People's Conference on Climate Change and Mother Earth's Rights) are included in the draft negotiating text.  At present the text overwhelmingly reflects the weak and ineffectual Copenhagn Accord imposed by a small number of major powers through illegitimate process last December, which will commit the world to climate disaster.

Read more and sign the statement here.

We need to ensure that all options are reflected in the text so that there is an option for more ambitious action to be agreed. This action is critical, please forward to all your contacts.

Read more...

Oil toxicity in the gulf--Riki Ott discusses the potential for a public health disaster

Riki Ott of Ultimate Civics and Move To Amend speaks to Rachel Maddow about the toxicity of oil and the possibility of a public health disaster in the Gulf and the so-far inadequate information being provided by government to the people in the areas affected by the spill.

Good stuff at the beginning on the possible effect of oil on wetlands and the cluelessness of Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour re oil exposure.

Read more...

Friday, June 4, 2010

1,400 with ties to Congress now lobbying for financial industry

A study by Public Citizen and the Center for Responsive Politics has found more than 1,400 former Congress members, ex-federal employees, and Capitol Hill aides registered as financial services industry lobbyists since 2009. Heavy hitters include former Senators Robert J. Dole and Trent Lott, and ex-Reps Richard K. Armey, Dick Gephardt, and J. Dennis Hastert.

For every sitting member of Congress, says the study, there are three former colleagues or government staffers lobbying for banks.

Today's Washington Post quoted David Arkush, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division, saying "Wall Street hires former members of Congress and their staff for a reason," especially at a time when lawmakers are debating a historic overhaul of the way Wall Street does business. "These people are influential because they have personal relationships with current members and staff," Arkush said. "It's hard to say no to your friends, but that's what Congress needs to do."

What do we need to do? Push for passage of the Fair Elections Now Act, for one. Public funding for a necessary public work--election of a representative government--undercuts the ability of a corporate elite to bribe our legislators with donations--or bully them with the threat of funding an opponent. And a 28th Amendment banning corporate personhood would get the toxic notion that money is speech out of our political system as well.

Read more...

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Alliance for Democracy at the US Social Forum

Alliance for Democracy is a sponsor or collaborating organization for the following 2-hour workshops and 4-hour Peoples Movement Assemblies. We are excited to be working with several other groups on these events. Workshop topics include strategy session for keeping water accessible and in public hands, rights-based organizing around toxins in water, and teaching about corporate plunder and community resistance with the Tapestry of the Commons presentation. Peoples Movement Assemblies will focus on health care, ecojustice, and corporate personhood.

Click on the "read more" link for full descriptions, and see you in Detroit!


Workshops:
1. Water Warriors Strategy Session
People’s Water Board of Detroit and Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, sponsoring organizations; AfD collaborating organization

Wednesday, June 23, 1:00 – 5:30 pm, Cobo Hall, Room D3-28

This four hour workshop will give Water Warriors from many areas an opportunity to share their struggles to obtain access to clean, affordable water and to discuss their vision and strategies for advancing those struggles. The People's Water Board is a coalition of organizations based in Detroit, Michigan that have come together to confront: 1) the devastating lack of access to water faced by thousands of low income people who have had their water shut off; 2) water pollution due to industrial irresponsibility and an aging wastewater infrastructure; and 3) the effort of corporate interests to gain control of Detroit's water system.

2. Our Democratic Right to Safe Water and Health

Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, sponsor; AfD, collaborating organization

Wednesday, June 23, 10:00 – 12:00 pm, Cobo Hall, Room O2-35

Safe water for personal and domestic use is essential for health and life. New science shows how trace amounts of chemicals and heavy metals in water cause life-threatening diseases and disrupt normal cognitive, neurological and reproductive development from cradle to grave. This accumulating “body burden” of toxics creates a “precondition” for disease at any time in life, even many years after exposure. Alarmingly, research shows how a mother’s “body burden” affects fetal development and the content of milk for the nursing child. Industry, agriculture and the military, the worst offenders, lobby government to lower regulations and fight in court against fines.

This workshop will lead participants in a discussion of how to reframe this issue from one of regulation that actually permits degrees of harm to that of asserting our rights. U.S. corporations, given the rights of persons in the 19th century, have no right to harm the bodies of natural persons. We, the People, must assert our fundamental, inalienable right to be free of involuntary invasion of our bodies by disease-causing toxics. Steps for communities to take to assert this democratic right will be presented such as: adopting a Precautionary Principle Ordinance for a city to act with “precaution” to prevent harms to the environment and protect public health even when full scientific evidence about cause and effect is lacking; and passing a “Chemical Trespass Ordinance” to prohibit corporate chemical bodily trespass, establish strict liability and burden of proof standards for chemical trespass, and subordinate corporations to the people.

3. Tapestry of the Commons: Corporate Plunder vs. Community Rights
Alliance for Democracy, sponsor; Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, collaborating organization

Thursday, June 24, 10:00 – 12:00 pm, UAW Building 1032

There is new focus on “the commons” as corporations and individuals commodify almost every aspect of nature and culture creation. We can not stand by as our shared “commonwealth” is turned into private property for global investors and the financial elite to profit. The central questions raised in this workshop are: what is “the commons,” what aspect of nature and culture creation should be part of the “the commons,” and what principles should apply to the use and sharing of “the commons.” Participants will create the Tapestry of the Commons by weaving together sets of ribbons that represent aspects of nature and of culture to envision how they are interwoven and interdependent.

Using interactive exercises participants will explore, how, for example, media, literature, movies, and advertising condition how we think about nature, what “rules," creations of culture, should apply to nature; who should be making these rules?

This workshop is suited to teachers looking for new, creative ways to explore these and many other questions with Elementary and Middle School students. The answers hold the keys to protecting and sharing the commons of nature on which all life depends, safeguarding our human culture, and advancing community democracy and the rights of nature over corporate plunder.

Peoples Movement Assemblies
All are held on Friday, June 25, from 1:-5:30 pm in Cobo Hall. Look for room assignments in the descriptions.

What the Health Happened and How Do We Get the Healthcare We Need?
Submitted by Healthcare-NOW with large group of collaborating organizations, including AfD Room M3-31, Cobo Hall

The national debate on health reform went from discussing the heath care we need to how to make health care an affordable, quality commodity for those who can pay for it. Groups will present to what happened in this past year that reduced an opportunity to improve our health system to a political win that restructures the broken employer-based for-profit insurance system we currently have. We will examine the recent health reform, and why the battle must continue with an understanding that the movement for the health care we need is connected to the broader movement demanding healthy food, adequate housing, the right to water and a clean environment, having control over your own life, and being able to fully participate in decisions about your community. This meeting will seek to engage those who have been organizing for an expanded and improved Medicare for All system, as well as new perspectives in the discussion to launch the movement for the right to health care in a new and transformative way uniting head, heart, and feet together to secure the health care we need. We must do it together with a broad people’s movement ready to commit to doing the work to build for the health care for people not for profit.

Climate Justice/Energy/Ecojustice and the Rights of Mother Earth
Two PMAs on this topic were submitted and are being combined; see the two descriptions below.
Room D3-28, Cobo Hall

#1: Climate Justice/Energy and Rights of Mother Earth
submitted by the Alliance for Democracy with edits by Tom Goldtooth, Indigenous Environmental Network and includes these collaborating organizations: Indigenous Environmental Network, Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative, Mountain Justice, Southern Tier Advocacy & Mitigation Project, Shaleshock Alliance, Southwest Workers Union, Southern Oregon Jobs with Justice

The 2009 Copenhagen global negotiations on climate change failed to produce a legally binding agreement when the U.S. joined forces with other countries to create an entirely new agreement called the Copenhagen Accords with weak targets and no legally binding obligations for the mitigation of climate change. The strengthening of a U.S.-based social movement to hold the U.S. accountable in national and international climate policy is critical.

From a social and environmental justice framework with intentional participation of communities of color, indigenous peoples and the poor, and communities impacted by extractive energy industries, there will be two 2-hour sessions. 1st: Report of the Global Peoples’ Summit on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth, Cochabamba, Bolivia, its’ Peoples’ Agreement and Working Group conclusions; 2nd: to share findings/strategize ideas for building a national campaign around such issues as exposing the false solutions of national and global climate policy and cross-cutting issues ranging from, but not limited to: community rights, energy, water as a human right, food security, economic paradigms, green jobs, and others issues brought forward.

Outcome: consider a U.S.-based social movement Declaration on climate change, human rights and Mother Earth as the source of all life, creating a new system based on the principles of harmony and balance to complement the Cochabamba “Protocols,” and call for a U.S. national summit for movement building beyond the USSF and the Cancun climate conference.

#2: Ecological Justice
Initiated by Ruckus Society and including Movement Generation, Southwest Workers Union, Environmental Justice Climate Coalition, GAIA, Mothers on the Move, Women of Color United, Just Transition Alliance, Global Justice Ecology Project, Indigenous Environmental Network, Communities for a Better Environment, Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, WEACT/EJ Leadership Forum on Climate Change, APEN, Gulf Coast Fellowship for Community Transformation, Institute for Policy Studies

For the last two decades, environmental justice communities have fought to win the right to live, work, play and pray free of toxins and poisons polluting our air, water, and land. Nearly twelve years after the Principles of Environmental Justice were drafted, our social movements understand that the systems that have allowed the poisoning of our communities have also stolen some of us from our lands while stealing land from others. Meanwhile, more and more of the earth’s precious resources have been stripped and misused, leaving once resilient natural systems and the earth’s climate systems on the verge of collapse.

While the US government tries to advance a carbon trading plan that brings another commonly-held resource – atmospheric space – into the market sphere, communities-of-color, Indigenous Peoples, and low-income communities will the hit first and worst by the effects of climate chaos.

In this critical moment, the USSF provides a key site for indigenous peoples, environmental justice, immigrant rights, economic justice, and other racial justice movements to come together to strategize to win community control over our lives and our resources. The voices of indigenous peoples and grassroots community organizations in impacted communities must be central to helping us foster communities of resistance and resilience that can rewrite the rules of the game based on transformed relationships – with each other and the earth.

At this Ecological Justice PMA, we hope to advance proposals from the grassroots for shared work on climate and ecological justice rooted in an understanding of the need to transform the global systems that determine the ways each of us gets to live, work and play.

End Corporate Rule. Legalize Democracy. Move to Amend the Constitution
Collaborating Organizations: Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County, Independent Progressive Politics Network, Ultimate Civics, Program on Corporations Law and Democracy, Liberty Tree: Foundation for the Democratic Revolution, Alliance for Democracy
Cobo Hall, Room W2-68

Participants will help design the Move to Amend campaign, and to participate through their regional networks and local organizations. We will break up into small groups and participants will develop Resolutions to include in the national Amendment discourse. Unelected and unaccountable corporate CEOS are not merely exercising power, they are RULING over us. Corporations make fundamental public policy decisions, while “We the People” have no opportunity for meaningful participation. And those decisions are literally destroying the planet, creating a racist, patriarchal and class-oppressive society with the plunder. Even when people’s movements build sufficient power to enact laws that actually address social injustice or environmental destruction, the wealthy elite overturn our laws in court. Often, the justification for overturning such democratically enacted laws is that those laws violate the “constitutional rights” of corporations. It’s time that we take ourselves and our movement seriously. We must not only challenge oppression itself, but the legal system that legitimizes that oppression. We must build a movement that calls for a new Constitution—one that acknowledges our RIGHT to create the peaceful, just and democratic world that we want and deserve. To do so, the legal doctrine of “Corporate Personhood” must be abolished! A multi-racial, gender balanced coalition of grassroots groups and national organizations are already working to do just that. We are calling for a series of Constitutional Amendments to make the unfulfilled promise of democracy a reality in the United States. For a complete list of coalition partners and PMA sponsors, see www.MoveToAmend.org.

Read more...

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

In Rhode Island? Join Nancy Lee Wood for a talk tomorrow night on post carbon future

The state of Rhode Island is not only smarting from one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, but is still cleaning up after torrential spring rains caused record flooding through the Pawtucket and Providence areas. So tomorrow's talk by Nancy Lee Wood, entitled "Entering the Post-Carbon Era: The Future Isn't What It Used To Be", is particularly timely.

Wood is an Institute Professor at Bristol Community College, and has spoken on and off campus on preparing for the age after the age of fossil fuels, including last year's southern New England Regional AfD meeting in Newton, Massachusetts.

Her talk starts at 7:00 p.m. (Thursday, June 3), in the Rochambeau Library Community Room, Hope Street at Rochambeau, Providence, Rhode Island. It is sponsored by R.I. Progressive Coalition, and is the second in the series "Jobs in Rhode Island: Influencing Factors." For information, please contact Ruth at rweiz@theworld.com.

Read more...

"Got Water?" AfD Portland sponsors a forum on Oregon's water supply

On Friday and Saturday, June 4 and 5, Alliance for Democracy's Portland, OR, chapter will sponsor a forum entitled "Got Water? Managing It for the Future." The forum promotes actions by opening our eyes to the fact that our water, our most precious natural resource, could be in danger if decisions aren't made today.

A complete agenda for the forum is available here, and background is available here on the Portland chapter's website.

The forum will be held at the First Unitarian Church, 12th and Salmon, Portland. Events begin Friday evening, and end Saturday evening with a screening of the film Liquid Assets: The Story of our Water Infrastructure. Here's the trailer:



Representatives of Oregon's water resource management bureau will be represented at the forum--they're in the process of writing the state's first water plan. Regional experts will attend the conference to help work through hard questions and provide an informed basis for planning. What are the non-negotiables with respect to water? How do we protect regional water What should the long-term vision be? Is water a human right? What is the role of for-profit companies in water use? Should we allow spring water to be bottled--or used by brewers--or shipped out of the watershed for metropolitan use or for agriculture?

The forum is free, but preregistration is required. Please email Nancy Matela at nancy.matela@gmail.com to preregister or to volunteer. Sack lunches are available for $10--please specify vegetarian or meat. There are no restaurants close to the church.

Read more...

The impact of bottled water in Maine

In late May, the Lamoine, Maine, Conservation Commission, the Bar Harbor Conservation Commission, the Union River Watershed Coalition, and Food & Water Watch, sponsored a showing of the documentary film "Tapped" and a panel discussion on bottled water and its impacts. You can listen to excerpts from the panel discussion and question and answer session at the Alliance's Defending Water in Maine website, featuring Rep. Jim Schatz of Blue Hill; Emily Posner, Coordinator for Defending Water for Life in Maine; Daphne Loring, Coordinator at the Maine Fair Trade Campaign; and Willem Brutsaert, an Environmental Engineer Professor at the University of Maine, and expert in groundwater and surface water hydrology. The discussion was recorded by Meredith DeFrancesco, and edited by Amy Browne.

Read more...

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Why Obama should put BP under temporary receivership

Robert Reich's five reasons for receivership focus on daylighting vital information and prioritizing public safety over shareholder profits and executive bonuses.


by Robert Reich. Posted May 31 on robertreich.org

It’s time for the federal government to put BP under temporary receivership, which gives the government authority to take over BP’s operations in the Gulf of Mexico until the gusher is stopped. This is the only way the public know what’s going on, be confident enough resources are being put to stopping the gusher, ensure BP’s strategy is correct, know the government has enough clout to force BP to use a different one if necessary, and be sure the President is ultimately in charge. 

If the government can take over giant global insurer AIG and the auto giant General Motors and replace their CEOs, in order to keep them financially solvent, it should be able to put BP’s north American operations into temporary receivership in order to stop one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history.



The Obama administration keeps saying BP is in charge because BP has the equipment and expertise necessary to do what’s necessary. But under temporary receivership, BP would continue to have the equipment and expertise. The only difference: the firm would unambiguously be working in the public’s interest. As it is now, BP continues to be responsible primarily to its shareholders, not to the American public. As a result, the public continues to worry that a private for-profit corporation is responsible for stopping a public tragedy.
Five reasons for taking such action:



1. We are not getting the truth from BP. BP has continuously and dramatically understated size of gusher. In the last few days, BP chief Tony Hayward has tried to refute reports from scientists that vast amounts of oil from the spill are spreading underwater. Hayward says BP’s sampling shows “no evidence” oil is massing and spreading underwater across the Gulf. Yet scientists from the University of South Florida, University of Georgia, University of Southern Mississippi and other institutions say they’ve detected vast amounts of underwater oil, including an area roughly 50 miles from the spill site and as deep as 400 feet. Government must be clearly in charge of getting all the facts, not waiting for what BP decides to disclose and when.



2. We have no way to be sure BP is devoting enough resources to stopping the gusher. BP is now saying it has no immediate way to stop up the well until August, when a new “relief” well will reach the gushing well bore, enabling its engineers to install cement plugs. August? If government were in direct control of BP’s north American assets, it would be able to devote whatever of those assets are necessary to stopping up the well right away.



3. BP’s new strategy for stopping the gusher is highly risky. It wants to sever the leaking pipe cleanly from atop the failed blowout preventer, and then install a new cap so the escaping oil can be pumped up to a ship on the surface. But scientists say that could result in an even bigger volume of oil – as much as 20 percent more — gushing from the well. At least under government receivership, public officials would be directly accountable for weighing the advantages and disadvantages of such a strategy. As of now, company officials are doing the weighing. Which brings us to the fourth argument for temporary receivership.



4.  Right now, the U.S. government has no authority to force BP to adopt a different strategy. Saturday, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and his team of scientists essentially halted BP’s attempt to cap the spewing well with a process known as “top kill,” which injected drilling mud and other materials to try to counter the upward pressure of the oil. Apparently the Administration team was worried that the technique would worsen the leak. But under what authority did the Administration act? It has none. Asked Sunday whether U.S. officials told BP to stop the top-kill attempt, Carol Browner, the White House environmental advisor, said, “We told them of our very, very grave concerns” about the danger. Expressing grave concerns is not enough. The President needs legal authority to order BP to protect the United States.



5. The President is not legally in charge. As long as BP is not under the direct control of the government he has no direct line of authority, and responsibility is totally confused. For example, listen for the “we” and “they” pronouns that were used by Carol Browner in response to a question on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday (emphasis added):  “We’re now going to move into a situation where they’re going to attempt to control the oil that’s coming out, move it to a vessel, take it onshore ….We always knew that the relief well was the permanent way to close this .… Now we move to the third option, which is to contain it. If [the new cap on the relief well is] a snug fit, then there could be very, very little oil. If they’re not able to get as snug a fit, then there could be more. We’re going to hope for the best and prepare for the worst.” When you get pronoun confusion like this, you can bet on confusion — both inside the Administration and among the public. There is no good reason why “they” are in charge of an operation of which “we” are hoping for the best and preparing for the worst.

The President should temporarily take over BP’s Gulf operations. We have a national emergency on our hands. No president would allow a nuclear reactor owned by a private for-profit company to melt down in the United States while remaining under the direct control of that company. The meltdown in the Gulf is the environmental equivalent.

Read more...

Ruling on Arizona law affects proposed public funding question in California

Full steam ahead on California's Prop. 15, which received a boost last week when a federal appeals court upheld a similar Arizona law on public campaign financing.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, a federal judge struck down the Arizona law claiming that in part it violated the free speech of privately funded candidates by providing extra funds to their publicly-funded opponents if the privately-funded candidates raise more than a specified amount of cash. The six GOP candidates and two conservative PACs who challenged the Arizona law claimed that the subsidy deterred private donations to the non-clean-elections candidates and thus chilled free speech.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals saw it otherwise, saying in a unanimous decision that the extra state funding--and widespread use of clean elections money--served the public interest in fighting political corruption and had little effect on private fundraising.

It's almost a week until Californians vote on Proposition 15, which provides public financing for secretary of state candidates, starting in 2014. The cash-strapped state will raise the money through a new fee on lobbyists.
You can read the ruling here, and the story here. Find out more about Prop 15 at the California Fair Election Act's website, here.

Read more...

Disclosing the meekness of the “Disclose” Bill

A little disclosure of our own--AfD is a member of the Move To Amend coalition, which, like Free Speech for People, is pushing for an anti-corporate personhood amendment to the Constitution. The difference is that Free Speech for People wants to bar corporate personhood rights and Move To Amend is going for broke and saying corporations have no personhood rights at all--after all, corporations have made ill use of more amendments than just the First!

by Jim Hightower. Posted at Jim Hightower.com on Wednesday May 26

At last – after weeks of detailed analyzing, careful deliberation, and creative crafting – Democratic leaders in Washington have unveiled their bold legislative response to the Supreme Court's January dictate allowing oceans of corporate campaign cash to flood America's elections.

And – Ta-Dah! – here it is: The DISCLOSE Act (or, more fully, the "Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections" Act). Gosh, couldn't they come up with a more cumbersome title?

More to the point, couldn't the Democrats have come up with a more proportional response to the Court's enthronement of corporate money over our people's democracy? The Court's decision is the nuclear bomb of politics, for it allows any and every corporate giant – from Wall Street to Walmart – to pour unlimited sums of money directly from their massive treasuries into campaigns to elect or defeat anyone they choose. And the Democrats' response is a disclosure bill?

Sadly, yes. The bill requires corporations and their front groups to disclose, by name, which outfit is paying for any particular campaign ad. That's good, of course, but – that's it? That's like legalizing bank robbery, as long as the robbers wear name-tags.

We can't let these pusillanimous Democrats get away with this pathetic response. It is, after all, our democracy that the Court is turning into a plutocracy. The proper response is one word: No. Actually, make that two words: Hell no! And the way to say it so it matters is with a constitutional amendment that overturns this outrageous ruling.

The court can issue rulings, but We the People are the rulers. If sad sack Democrats won't stand up for us, we must to do it ourselves. Connect with a nationwide coalition pushing an amendment to overrule the Court: www.freespeechforpeople.org.

Read more...