Monday, May 24, 2010

Rep. Alan Grayson introduces the "War Is Making You Poor" act

Another well-named and commonsense idea to keep private wealth and public investment where they will do the most good for the greatest number.

By Joshua Holland. Posted on Alternet May 23

Last week, as Congress prepared to pass yet another "emergency" spending bill to cover America's costly operations in Iraq and Afghanistan -- to the tune of $159 billion this time around -- Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Florida, introduced a bill that would force the Pentagon to pick up the tab out of its ample regular budget.

The War Is Making You Poor Act is elegant in its simplicity. Instead of financing these longstanding conflicts outside of the regular budgeting process, where they’re not factored into deficit projections, Grayson's bill would make the DoD work within its means, and the money would instead be used for an across-the-board tax cut that would make the first $35,000 each American earns tax-free.

"The purpose of this bill,” wrote Grayson last week, "is to connect the dots, and to
show people in a real and concrete way the cost of these endless wars." It's not
just the costs of active shooting wars; with hundreds of bases overseas, as far as
the defense budget is concerned Americans have been on a permanent wartime footing,
to varying degrees, since Pearl Harbor was attacked in 1941. "War is a permanent
feature of our societal landscape," wrote Grayson, "so much so that no one notices
it anymore."

The bill already has several co-sponsors, including at least two Republicans (albeit
maverick GOPers Ron Paul of Texas and Walter Jones of South Carolina). But since the
Pentagon would have to take money out of its regular budget -- largely from the
budget for newfangled hardware -- the DoD and influential defense contractors will
no doubt fight it tooth-and-nail.

But the War Is Making You Poor Act might have a major impact on our national
dialogue regardless. It highlights in a visceral way what Americans lose by
privileging money for guns over butter. "The costs of the war have been rendered
invisible," wrote Grayson. "There's no draft. Instead, we take the most vulnerable
elements of our population, and give them a choice between unemployment and missile
fodder. Government deficits conceal the need to pay in cash for the war." Grayson’s
measure might just shine a bright light on those "opportunity costs."

Budgeting is all about priorities, and the bill can raise public awareness of that
fact. The Right has done a remarkable job convincing the American public that tax
dollars used for programs that help the middle class or the poor are dollars "taken
out of your pocket," but no such consideration is given to the trillions spent on
financing our military operations.

No comments: